TY -的盟Kongsved西丝儿玛丽盟——Basnov玛雅AU - Holm-Christensen时,库尔特盟——Hjollund,尼尔斯·亨瑞克PY - 2007 DA - 2007/9/31 TI -问卷的反应率和完整性:一项随机研究互联网与纸笔版本乔- J地中海互联网Res SP - e25六世- 9 - 3 KW -问卷设计KW -随机分配KW -互联网KW -邮政KW -评价KW -数据收集方法AB -背景:对生活质量的研究传统上依赖于纸笔调查问卷。互联网的便捷接入激发了许多利用互联网收集问卷调查数据的研究。然而，基于互联网的数据收集在响应率和数据质量以及所涉及量表的有效性和可靠性方面可能与传统方法有所不同。目的:我们采用随机设计比较纸笔问卷与网络版本的相同问卷在回复率和数据完整性方面的差异。方法:2004年9月至2005年4月在丹麦一家公立医院进行乳房x光检查的年龄小于67岁且无乳腺癌病史的妇女符合研究条件。这些女性收到了参加的邀请，同时也收到了放射科的常规信函。共有533名女性被邀请参加。他们被随机分成两组，一组收到一份纸质问卷，连同一个预付的回执信封，另一组收到一份关于如何在线填写基于互联网的问卷的指南。问卷共17页，共119项，包括短表36、多维疲劳量表20、医院焦虑抑郁量表，以及社会地位、教育程度、职业、互联网使用情况等问题。 Nonrespondents received a postal reminder giving them the option of filling out the other version of the questionnaire. Results: The response rate before the reminder was 17.9% for the Internet group compared to 73.2% for the paper-and-pencil group (risk difference 55.3%, P < .001). After the reminder, when the participant could chose between versions of the questionnaire, the total response rate for the Internet and paper-and-pencil group was 64.2% and 76.5%, respectively (risk difference 12.2%, P = .002). For the Internet version, 97.8% filled in a complete questionnaire without missing data, while 63.4% filled in a complete questionnaire for the paper-and-pencil version (risk difference 34.5%, P < .001). Conclusions: The Internet version of the questionnaire was superior with respect to completeness of data, but the response rate in this population of unselected patients was low. The general population has yet to become more familiar with the Internet before an online survey can be the first choice of researchers, although it is worthwhile considering within selected populations of patients as it saves resources and provides more complete answers. An Internet version may be combined with the traditional version of a questionnaire, and in follow-up studies of patients it may be more feasible to offer Internet versions. SN - 1438-8871 UR - //www.mybigtv.com/2007/3/e25/ UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.9.3.e25 DO - 10.2196/jmir.9.3.e25 ID - info:doi/10.2196/jmir.9.3.e25 ER -