TY - JOUR AU - Denniss, Emily AU - Lindberg, Rebecca AU - McNaughton, Sarah A PY - 2022 DA - 2022/9/8 TI -社交媒体上健康相关信息原则的制定:德尔菲研究乔- J地中海互联网Res SP - e37337六世- 24 - 9千瓦——社交媒体KW -健康信息KW -信息质量KW -质量评估KW -研究工具千瓦可信度指标KW -信誉KW -可信KW -电子健康KW - Delphi KW -评估工具KW -测量工具KW -基于web的信息KW -手机AB -背景:健康相关错误信息可以通过社会媒体和传播是一个对公众健康的威胁。现有若干质量评估工具和原则，用于评估公共领域的健康相关信息;然而，这些并不是专门为社交媒体设计的。目的:本研究旨在制定《社交媒体健康相关信息准则》(prism)，用以评估社交媒体健康相关内容的质量。方法:采用改进的德尔菲法(Delphi)，以获得专家对prism原则和功能的共识。健康和社会媒体专家通过推特、电子邮件和滚雪球一样被招募。2021年2月至2021年5月期间共进行了3次调查。第一项调查是通过文献综述得知的，包括现有质量评估工具中的开放式问题和项目。随后的调查以正在进行的调查的结果为依据。 Consensus was deemed if ≥80% agreement was reached, and items with consensus were considered relevant to include in PRHISM. After the third survey, principles were finalized, and an instruction manual and scoring tool for PRHISM were developed and circulated to expert participants for final feedback. Results: A total of 34 experts consented to participate, of whom 18 (53%) responded to all 3 Delphi surveys. In total, 13 principles were considered relevant and were included in PRHISM. When the instructions and PRHISM scoring tool were circulated, no objections to the wording of the final principles were received. Conclusions: A total of 13 quality principles were included in the PRHISM tool, along with a scoring system and implementation tool. The principles promote accessibility, transparency, provision of authoritative and evidence-based information and support for consumers’ relationships with health care providers. PRHISM can be used to evaluate the quality of health-related information provided on social media. These principles may also be useful to content creators for developing high-quality health-related social media content and assist consumers in discerning high- and low-quality information. SN - 1438-8871 UR - //www.mybigtv.com/2022/9/e37337 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/37337 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36074544 DO - 10.2196/37337 ID - info:doi/10.2196/37337 ER -