TY -非盟的亚历山大,雪莱AU -希,克里斯PY - 2022 DA - 2022/10/17 TI -信誉,准确性,全面性现成的基于互联网的信息处理和管理的外周动脉疾病和间歇性跛行:回顾乔- J地中海互联网Res SP - e39555六世24 - 10 KW -外周动脉疾病千瓦间歇性跛行KW -健康信息KW -教育KW -互联网KW -电子健康KW -数字医疗AB -背景:外周动脉疾病(PAD)影响着全球数百万人，这种疾病管理的核心部分是自我管理。互联网是许多人获取健康信息的重要来源。然而，关于外周动脉疾病治疗建议的网站内容还没有得到充分评价。目的:本研究旨在评估通过一个通用搜索引擎找到的网站的可信度、准确性和全面性，将其内容与当前PAD和间歇性跛行(IC)的治疗和管理指南进行比较。方法:对美国和英国的医院、大学、政府、消费者组织和专业协会的网站进行了审查。网站建议的外周动脉疾病和内源性心脏病的治疗是按照国家健康和护理卓越研究所(NICE)和美国心脏协会(AHA)的指南进行编码的。主要结果是网站可信度(4项美国医学协会杂志的基准)，网站准确性(就准确推荐的百分比而言)和网站推荐的全面性(就适当覆盖的指南推荐的百分比而言)。次要结果是可读性(Flesch-Kincaid等级)和网站质量(网络健康基金会的行为准则)。结果:经过筛选，共有62个网站被纳入分析。 Only 45% (28/62) of websites met the credibility requirement by stating they were updated after the NICE guidelines were published. Declaration of authorship and funding and the presence of reference lists were less commonly reported. Regarding accuracy, 81% (556/685) of website recommendations were deemed accurate on following NICE’s and the AHA’s recommendations. Comprehensiveness was low, with an average of 40% (25/62) of guideline treatment recommendations being appropriately covered by websites. In most cases, readability scores revealed that the websites were too complex for web-based consumer health information. Conclusions: Web-based information from reputable sources about the treatment and management of PAD and IC are generally accurate but have low comprehensiveness, credibility, and readability. SN - 1438-8871 UR - //www.mybigtv.com/2022/10/e39555 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/39555 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36251363 DO - 10.2196/39555 ID - info:doi/10.2196/39555 ER -