TY -的AU -纳达尔,卡米尔AU - Sas,科瑞娜AU -多尔蒂,Gavin PY - 2020 DA - 2020/7/6 TI -技术接受移动健康:范围的定义,模型,和测量乔- J地中海互联网Res SP - e17256六世- 22 - 7 KW -技术验收周期KW -病人接受KW -移动应用KW - mHealth KW -手机AB -背景:设计技术,用户将感兴趣,开始使用,一直使用一直是一个挑战。在健康领域，接受技术的问题更为重要，因为技术的可能侵入性可能导致患者甚至拒绝尝试它们。开发人员和研究人员不仅要在设计和评估新的医疗保健技术时解决这个问题，而且要在用户旅程的不同阶段解决这个问题。虽然这些阶段的定义范围存在，许多研究人员混淆了相关术语，该领域将受益于一套连贯的定义和相关的测量方法。目的:本综述旨在探讨在移动医疗(mHealth)文献中如何解释和测量技术接受度。我们试图将移动医疗研究中的接受治疗与现有的定义和模型进行比较，找出潜在的差距，并有助于澄清技术接受的过程。方法:我们在PubMed数据库中搜索以医学主题标题“患者接受医疗保健”和“移动应用程序”为索引的出版物。我们收录了以下出版物:(1)包含至少一个术语“可接受性”、“接受”、“采用”、“接受”或“采用”;(2)定义了项。最终的语料库包括68项相关研究。 Results: Several interpretations are associated with technology acceptance, few consistent with existing definitions. Although the literature has influenced the interpretation of the concept, usage is not homogeneous, and models are not adapted to populations with particular needs. The prevalence of measurement by custom surveys suggests a lack of standardized measurement tools. Conclusions: Definitions from the literature were published separately, which may contribute to inconsistent usage. A definition framework would bring coherence to the reporting of results, facilitating the replication and comparison of studies. We propose the Technology Acceptance Lifecycle, consolidating existing definitions, articulating the different stages of technology acceptance, and providing an explicit terminology. Our findings illustrate the need for a common definition and measurement framework and the importance of viewing technology acceptance as a staged process, with adapted measurement methods for each stage. SN - 1438-8871 UR - //www.mybigtv.com/2020/7/e17256 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/17256 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32628122 DO - 10.2196/17256 ID - info:doi/10.2196/17256 ER -