用于研究老年人社交机器人的可行性、可用性、功效和有效性的方法:卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析范围审查%A Mahmoudi Asl,Aysan %A Molinari Ulate,Mauricio %A Franco Martin,Manuel %A van der Roest,Henriëtte %+研究与发展部门，伊比利亚心理科学研究所，INTRAS基金会，C. de la Hiniesta, 137，萨莫拉，49024，西班牙，34 604543985，amahmoudi@ides.es %K老年%K痴呆%K社交机器人%K宠物机器人%K社区设置%K长期护理%K方法%K范围审查%D 2022 %7 1.8.2022 %9审查%J J医学互联网研究%G英语%X背景:设计老年人社交机器人的新研究领域正在兴起。通过提供交流和社会互动的支持，这些机器人旨在提高生活质量。由于老年人因认知障碍而导致功能下降，社交机器人被认为是有前途的，特别是对于患有痴呆症的人。虽然研究结果是有希望的，但由于许多方法的限制，关于老年人社交机器人有效性的研究质量仍然很低。目的:我们旨在回顾迄今为止在评估社交机器人在老年人(包括痴呆症患者)的临床和社会环境中的可行性、可用性、功效和有效性的研究中使用的方法。方法:开发专用搜索字符串。于2020年8月13日在MEDLINE (PubMed)、Web of Science、PsycInfo和CINAHL中进行检索。结果:在纳入的33篇论文中，研究了23种不同的社交机器人的可行性、可用性、功效和有效性。 A total of 8 (24.2%) studies included elderly persons in the community, 9 (27.3%) included long-term care facility residents, and 16 (48.5%) included people with dementia. Most of the studies had a single aim, of which 7 (21.2%) focused on efficacy and 7 (21.2%) focused on effectiveness. Moreover, forms of randomized controlled trials were the most applied designs. Feasibility and usability were often studied together in mixed methods or experimental designs and were most often studied in individual interventions. Feasibility was often assessed with the Unified Theory of the Acceptance and Use of Technology model. Efficacy and effectiveness studies used a range of psychosocial and cognitive outcome measures. However, the included studies failed to find significant improvements in quality of life, depression, and cognition. Conclusions: This study identified several shortcomings in methodologies used to evaluate social robots, resulting in ambivalent study findings. To improve the quality of these types of studies, efficacy/effectiveness studies will benefit from appropriate randomized controlled trial designs with large sample sizes and individual intervention sessions. Experimental designs might work best for feasibility and usability studies. For each of the 3 goals (efficacy/effectiveness, feasibility, and usability) we also recommend a mixed method of data collection. Multiple interaction sessions running for at least 1 month might aid researchers in drawing significant results and prove the real long-term impact of social robots. %M 35916695 %R 10.2196/37434 %U //www.mybigtv.com/2022/8/e37434 %U https://doi.org/10.2196/37434 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35916695