@Article{信息:doi 10.2196 / / jmir。4194，作者=“Roberts, Matthew John和Perera, Marlon和Lawrentschuk, Nathan和Romanic, Diana和Papa, Nathan和Bolton, Damien”，标题=“期刊俱乐部通过微博持续专业发展的全球化:系统评论”，期刊=“J Med Internet Res”，年=“2015”，月=“4”，日=“23”，卷=“17”，数=“4”，页=“e103”，关键词=“期刊俱乐部;社交媒体;继续医学教育;持续专业发展;背景:期刊俱乐部是向所有医疗和相关卫生专业人员推广临床循证医学教育的重要工具。Twitter代表了一个公共的微博论坛，它可以促进传统期刊俱乐部的需求，同时也可以接触到全球受众，并参与与研究作者和同事的讨论。目的:当前研究的目的是评估社交媒体促进期刊俱乐部的现状，特别是Twitter，作为持续专业发展的一个例子。方法:根据系统评价和meta分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南对文献数据库(Medline、Embase、CINAHL、Web of Science、ERIC via ProQuest)进行系统评价。对Twitter、已确定的期刊俱乐部和Symplur的追随者也进行了系统的搜索。 Demographic and monthly tweet data were extracted from Twitter and Symplur. All manuscripts related to Twitter-based journal clubs were included. Statistical analyses were performed in MS Excel and STATA. Results: From a total of 469 citations, 11 manuscripts were included and referred to five Twitter-based journal clubs ({\#}ALiEMJC, {\#}BlueJC, {\#}ebnjc, {\#}urojc, {\#}meded). A Twitter-based journal club search yielded 34 potential hashtags/accounts, of which 24 were included in the final analysis. The median duration of activity was 11.75 (interquartile range [IQR] 19.9, SD 10.9) months, with 7 now inactive. The median number of followers and participants was 374 (IQR 574) and 157 (IQR 272), respectively. An overall increasing establishment of active Twitter-based journal clubs was observed, resulting in an exponential increase in total cumulative tweets (R2=.98), and tweets per month (R2=.72). Cumulative tweets for specific journal clubs increased linearly, with @ADC{\_}JC, @EBNursingBMJ, @igsjc, @iurojc, and @NephJC, and showing greatest rate of change, as well as total impressions per month since establishment. An average of two tweets per month was estimated for the majority of participants, while the ``Top 10'' tweeters for @iurojc showed a significantly lower contribution to overall tweets for each month (P<.005). A linearly increasing impression:tweet ratio was observed for the top five journal clubs. Conclusions: Twitter-based journal clubs are free, time-efficient, and publicly accessible means to facilitate international discussions regarding clinically important evidence-based research. ", issn="1438-8871", doi="10.2196/jmir.4194", url="//www.mybigtv.com/2015/4/e103/", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4194", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25908092" }