@文章{信息:doi/10.2196/37718，作者=“DeWitt, Akeiylah and Kientz, Julie and Coker, Tumaini R and Liljenquist, Kendra”，标题=“早期儿童健康促进的移动健康技术设计与评估:系统文献综述”，期刊=“JMIR儿科家长”，年=“2022”，月=“10”，日=“6”，卷=“5”，号=“4”，页=“e37718”，关键词=“移动健康技术;促进幼儿健康;儿童发展;家长支持技术;背景:在服务不足的人群中，最近智能手机拥有量的增加激发了医学、计算和健康信息学领域的研究人员设计和评估移动健康(mHealth)干预措施，特别是那些支持儿童发育和成长的干预措施。尽管这些干预措施在更大范围内显示出可能的有效性，但这些干预措施中很少有针对种族差异和健康公平的评估，这些因素是影响目标人群相关性、吸收和依从性的已知因素。目的:在本研究中，我们旨在确定并记录促进幼儿健康的移动健康技术的当前设计和评估实践，并特别关注这些过程解决健康差异和健康公平的机会。方法:我们对设计和评估移动健康干预措施促进幼儿健康的研究进行了系统的文献综述。然后，我们分析了这些研究，以确定在早期和晚期过程中解决种族差异的机会，并了解这些干预措施的潜在功效。结果:在医学、计算机和健康信息学领域的文献中，我们确定了15篇文章介绍了面向父母的健康干预的设计或评估。 We found that using mobile-based systems to deliver health interventions was generally well accepted by parents of children aged <5 years. We also found that, when measured, parenting knowledge of early childhood health topics and confidence to engage in health-promoting behaviors improved. Design and evaluation methods held internal consistency within disciplines (eg, experimental study designs were the most prevalent in medical literature, while computing researchers used user-centered design methods in computing fields). However, there is little consistency in design or evaluation methods across fields. Conclusions: To support more interventions with a comprehensive design and evaluation process, we recommend attention to design at the intervention (eg, reporting content sources) and system level; interdisciplinary collaboration in early childhood health intervention development can lead to large-scale deployment and success among populations. Trial Registration: PROSPERO CRD42022359797; https://tinyurl.com/586nx9a2 ", issn="2561-6722", doi="10.2196/37718", url="https://pediatrics.www.mybigtv.com/2022/4/e37718", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/37718", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36201391" }