TY -的AU - de Cock,卡罗琳AU - van Velthoven,米歇尔盟——Milne-Ives麦迪逊AU -穆尼,玛丽盟——Meinert爱德华PY - 2020 DA - 2020/5/18 TI -使用的应用促进儿童期疫苗接种:系统回顾乔- Uhealth Mhealth JMIR SP - e17371六世- 8 - 5 KW -疫苗接种KW -疫苗接种覆盖率KW -移动应用KW -婴儿KW -儿童期疫苗接种KW -免疫KW -智能手机技术KW -手机AB -背景:疫苗接种是降低儿童死亡率的关键步骤;然而，近年来许多国家的疫苗接种率有所下降。这种减少与疫苗可预防疾病爆发的增加有关。在开发众多移动应用程序的过程中，研究了利用移动平台促进疫苗接种覆盖率的潜力。尽管许多应用程序可供公众使用，但对这些应用程序的可靠评估却很少。目的:本系统综述旨在评估支持儿童疫苗接种的应用程序在提高疫苗接种率、知识和决策方面的有效性，以及这些应用程序的可用性和用户感知。方法:系统检索PubMed、摘录医学数据库(EMBASE)、Web of Science、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库、ClinicalTrials.gov和教育资源信息中心(ERIC)数据库，检索2008年至2019年发表的评估儿童疫苗接种应用程序的研究。两位作者根据纳入和排除标准筛选和选择研究。提取和分析数据，并评估研究的偏倚风险。 Results: A total of 28 studies evaluating 25 apps met the inclusion criteria and were included in this analysis. Overall, 9 studies assessed vaccination uptake, of which 4 reported significant benefits (P<.001 or P=.03) of the implementation of the app. Similarly, 4 studies indicated a significant (P≤.054) impact on knowledge and on vaccination decision making. Patient perceptions, usability, and acceptability were generally positive. The quality of the included studies was found to be moderate to poor, with many aspects of the methodology being unclear. Conclusions: There is little evidence to support the use of childhood vaccination apps to improve vaccination uptake, knowledge, or decision making. Further research is required to understand the dichotomous effects of vaccination-related information provision and the evaluation of these apps in larger, more robust studies. The methodology of studies must be reported more comprehensively to accurately assess the effectiveness of childhood vaccination apps and the risk of bias of studies. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/16929 SN - 2291-5222 UR - https://mhealth.www.mybigtv.com/2020/5/e17371 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/17371 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32421684 DO - 10.2196/17371 ID - info:doi/10.2196/17371 ER -