%0期刊文章%@ 2291-5222 %I JMIR Publicat卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析ions Inc. %V 3 %N 3 %P 82 %T基于正念的iPhone应用程序的审查和评估%A Mani,Madhavan %A Kavanagh,David J %A Hides,Leanne %A Stoyanov,Stoyan R %+昆士兰科技大学心理与咨询学院健康与生物医学创新研究所，Kelvin Grove, 4059，澳大利亚，61 434190971，m.mani@qut.edu.au %K正念基于正念的移动应用程序%K移动健康(mHealth) %K心理健康%D 2015 %7 19.08.2015 %9原文mHealth mHealth背景:越来越多的证据表明正念对健康有积极影响。基于正念的移动应用程序可能有潜力成为培训的另一种传播媒介。虽然有数百个这样的应用程序，但几乎没有关于它们质量的信息。目的:本研究旨在对基于正念的iPhone移动应用程序进行系统回顾，并使用最新开发的专家评级量表——移动应用程序评级量表(MARS)来评估它们的质量。它还旨在描述精选的高质量正念应用程序的功能。方法:在iTunes和Google Apps Marketplace中搜索“正念”。其中包括提供正念训练和教育的应用程序。那些只包含提醒、计时器或引导冥想的歌曲被排除在外。一位专家评估师使用MARS参与度、功能、视觉美学、信息质量和主观质量子量表对应用程序质量进行了评估和评级。 A second rater provided MARS ratings on 30% of the apps for inter-rater reliability purposes. Results: The “mindfulness” search identified 700 apps. However, 94 were duplicates, 6 were not accessible and 40 were not in English. Of the remaining 560, 23 apps met inclusion criteria and were reviewed. The median MARS score was 3.2 (out of 5.0), which exceeded the minimum acceptable score (3.0). The Headspace app had the highest average score (4.0), followed by Smiling Mind (3.7), iMindfulness (3.5) and Mindfulness Daily (3.5). There was a high level of inter-rater reliability between the two MARS raters. Conclusions: Though many apps claim to be mindfulness-related, most were guided meditation apps, timers, or reminders. Very few had high ratings on the MARS subscales of visual aesthetics, engagement, functionality or information quality. Little evidence is available on the efficacy of the apps in developing mindfulness. %M 26290327 %R 10.2196/mhealth.4328 %U http://mhealth.www.mybigtv.com/2015/3/e82/ %U https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.4328 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26290327

map