@文章{信息:doi/10.2196/17458，作者="Lecomte, Tania和Potvin, St{\'e}phane和Corbi{\ 'e} re, Marc和Guay, St{\'e}phane和Samson, Crystal和Cloutier, Briana和Francoeur, Audrey和Pennou, Antoine和Khazaal, Yasser"，标题="心理健康问题的移动应用程序:元分析的元回顾"，期刊="JMIR Mhealth Uhealth"，年="2020"，月="五月"，日="29"，卷="8"，数="5"，页="e17458"，关键词="应用程序;心理健康;抑郁症;焦虑;审查;背景:心理健康应用程序在帮助需要支持的人应对痛苦或特定症状方面具有巨大潜力。事实上，互联网上可用的心理健康应用程序的数量呈指数级增长，真正被研究的不到5%。目的:本研究旨在评估有关心理健康应用程序使用的现有证据的质量，并总结迄今为止获得的结果。方法:搜索系统综述和元分析，特别是关于心理健康问题或症状的移动应用程序，并使用建议评估、开发和评估分级系统进行评级。结果:共7项meta分析被仔细回顾和评分。 Although some meta-analyses looked at any mental health issue and analyzed the data together, these studies were of poorer quality and did not offer strong empirical support for the apps. Studies focusing specifically on anxiety symptoms or depressive symptoms were of moderate to high quality and generally had small to medium effect sizes. Similarly, the effects of apps on stress and quality of life tended to offer small to medium effects and were of moderate to high quality. Studies looking at stand-alone apps had smaller effect sizes but better empirical quality than studies looking at apps with guidance. The studies that included follow-ups mostly found a sustained impact of the app at an 11-week follow-up. Conclusions: This meta-review revealed that apps for anxiety and depression hold great promise with clear clinical advantages, either as stand-alone self-management or as adjunctive treatments. More meta-analyses and more quality studies are needed to recommend apps for other mental health issues or for specific populations. ", issn="2291-5222", doi="10.2196/17458", url="https://mhealth.www.mybigtv.com/2020/5/e17458", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/17458", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32348289" }