@Article{信息:doi 10.2196 / /移动医疗。2543，作者="Oliveira, Jonice和Souza, Diego Da Silva和de Lima, Patr{\'i}cia Zudio和Da Silveira, Pedro C和de Souza, Jano Moreira"，标题="增强医疗保健背景下的知识流动:移动计算方法"，期刊="JMIR mHealth uHealth"，年="2014"，月=" 11月"，日="26"，卷="2"，数="4"，页="e17"，关键词="知识共享;卫生保健;移动计算;医学2.0;合作互动;背景:移动计算和无线通信的进步使人们几乎可以在任何地方进行互动和交换知识。这些技术支持医学2.0，在医学2.0中，健康知识在所有相关人员(如患者、护理人员、医生和患者亲属)之间流动。目的:我们的论文提出了一个知识共享环境，利用移动计算和上下文信息来支持卫生保健社区内参与者之间的知识共享(即从患者到卫生专业人员)。该软件环境允许基于用户档案使用点对点(P2P)移动网络进行知识交换，并促进具有相似健康兴趣、需求或目标的人之间的面对面互动。 Methods: First, we reviewed and analyzed relevant scientific articles and software apps to determine the current state of knowledge flow within health care. Although no proposal was capable of addressing every aspect in the Medicine 2.0 paradigm, a list of requirements was compiled. Using this requirement list and our previous works, a knowledge-sharing environment was created integrating Mobile Exchange of Knowledge (MEK) and the Easy to Deploy Indoor Positioning System (EDIPS), and a twofold qualitative evaluation was performed. Second, we analyzed the efficiency and reliability of the knowledge that the integrated MEK-EDIPS tool provided to users according to their interest topics, and then performed a proof of concept with health professionals to determine the feasibility and usefulness of using this solution in a real-world scenario. Results: . Using MEK, we reached 100{\%} precision and 80{\%} recall in the exchange of files within the peer-to-peer network. The mechanism that facilitated face-to-face interactions was evaluated by the difference between the location indicated by the EDIPS tool and the actual location of the people involved in the knowledge exchange. The average distance error was <6.28 m for an indoor environment. The usability and usefulness of this tool was assessed by questioning a sample of 18 health professionals: 94{\%} (17/18) agreed the integrated MEK-EDIPS tool provides greater interaction among all the participants (eg, patients, caregivers, doctors, and patients' relatives), most considered it extremely important in the health scenario, 72{\%} (13/18) believed it could increase the knowledge flow in a health environment, and 67{\%} (12/18) recommend it or would like to recommend its use. Conclusions: The integrated MEK-EDIPS tool can provide more services than any other software tool analyzed in this paper. The proposed integrated MEK-EDIPS tool seems to be the best alternative for supporting health knowledge flow within the Medicine 2.0 paradigm. ", issn="2291-5222", doi="10.2196/mhealth.2543", url="http://mhealth.www.mybigtv.com/2014/4/e17/", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.2543", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25427923" }