TY -非盟的诺曼·卡梅伦D AU -斯金纳,哈维PY - 2006 DA - 2006/11/14 TI - eHEALS:电子健康素养规模乔- J地中海互联网Res SP - e27六世- 8 - 4 KW -互联网KW -识字KW -公共卫生KW -心理测验学KW -定量评价AB -背景:电子健康资源是有用的只有当人们能够使用它们,然而仍有一些工具来评估消费者对从事电子健康的能力。超过40%的美国和加拿大成年人基本文化水平较低，这表明大部分人口可能无法获得电子卫生资源。将信息技术用于卫生需要电子卫生素养——阅读、使用计算机、搜索信息、理解卫生信息并将其纳入上下文的能力。电子健康素养量表(eHEALS)的设计(1)是为了评估消费者在使用信息技术促进健康方面的感知技能，(2)是为了帮助确定电子健康项目与消费者之间的契合度。目的:eHEALS是一项电子健康素养的8项测量，用于测量消费者在发现、评估和应用电子健康信息到健康问题方面的综合知识、舒适度和感知技能。本研究的目的是在人群背景下对eHEALS的特性进行心理计量学评估。选择青年人口作为初步开发的重点，主要是因为他们使用电子保健的程度很高，并且熟悉信息技术工具。方法:在基线、干预后、3个月和6个月随访时收集数据，使用对照组数据作为单疗程随机干预试验的一部分，评估基于web的eHealth项目。量表的信度采用项目分析的内部一致性(系数alpha)和测试重测信度估计进行测试。采用主成分因子分析来确定测量值与数据的理论拟合程度。 Results: A total of 664 participants (370 boys; 294 girls) aged 13 to 21 (mean = 14.95; SD = 1.24) completed the eHEALS at four time points over 6 months. Item analysis was performed on the 8-item scale at baseline, producing a tight fitting scale with α = .88. Item-scale correlations ranged from r = .51 to .76. Test-retest reliability showed modest stability over time from baseline to 6-month follow-up (r = .68 to .40). Principal components analysis produced a single factor solution (56% of variance). Factor loadings ranged from .60 to .84 among the 8 items. Conclusions: The eHEALS reliably and consistently captures the eHealth literacy concept in repeated administrations, showing promise as tool for assessing consumer comfort and skill in using information technology for health. Within a clinical environment, the eHEALS has the potential to serve as a means of identifying those who may or may not benefit from referrals to an eHealth intervention or resource. Further research needs to examine the applicability of the eHEALS to other populations and settings while exploring the relationship between eHealth literacy and health care outcomes. SN - 1438-8871 UR - //www.mybigtv.com/2006/4/e27/ UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8.4.e27 DO - 10.2196/jmir.8.4.e27 ID - info:doi/10.2196/jmir.8.4.e27 ER -