TY -的AU -巴德,朱迪斯•L AU - Strickman-Stein南希PY - 2003 DA - 2003/8/29 TI -评估新的癌症通信多媒体格式乔- J地中海互联网Res SP - e16天六世- 5 - 3 KW -肺癌KW -互联网KW -多媒体KW -病人教育KW -音频AB -背景:提供优质、当前癌症信息癌症患者和他们的家庭是一个关键功能的国家癌症研究所(NCI)的网站。这些信息现在主要以文本格式提供，但也可以使用多媒体格式提供，包括动画和声音。由于用户对于从哪里获取信息有很多选择，所以以他们喜欢的有用格式提供信息是很重要的。目的:为了试验和评估未来癌症信息节目格式的多媒体策略，美国国家癌症研究所为现有的文本节目创建了新的多媒体版本。我们试图评估这3种新格式和2种现有文本格式的用户性能和偏好。方法:国家癌症研究所的“关于肺癌你需要知道什么”项目是测试工具。总共有5个测试环节，每种格式各有1个。每次会话持续约1小时，每次会话9名参与者，总共45名用户。用户从头到尾以5种格式接触指定的癌症项目:文本平装小册子、网页上HTML格式的平装小册子、单独的口语音频、与文本网页同步的口语音频以及Flash多媒体(动画、口语音频和文本)。随后，详细演示了4种备选格式的特性和设计。 A multiple-choice pre-test and post-test quiz on the cancer content was used to assess user learning (performance) before and after experiencing the assigned program. The quiz was administered using an Authorware software interface writing to an Access database. Users were asked to rank from 1 to 5 their preference for the 5 program formats, and provide structured and open-ended comments about usability of the 5 formats. Results: Significant improvement in scores from pre-test to post-test was seen for the total study population. Average scores for users in each of the 5 format groups improved significantly. Increments in improvement, however, were not statistically different between any of the format groups. Significant improvements in quiz scores were seen irrespective of age group or education level. Of the users, 71.1% ranked the Flash program first among the 5 formats, and 84.4% rated Flash as their first or second choice. Audio was the least-preferred format, ranking fifth among 46.7% of users and first among none. Flash was ranked first among users regardless of education level, age group, or format group to which the user was assigned. Conclusions: Under the pilot study conditions, users overwhelmingly preferred the Flash format to the other 4 formats. Learning occurred equally in all formats. Use of multimedia should be considered as communication strategies are developed for updating cancer content and attracting new users. SN - 1438-8871 UR - //www.mybigtv.com/2003/3/e16/ UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5.3.e16 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14517107 DO - 10.2196/jmir.5.3.e16 ID - info:doi/10.2196/jmir.5.3.e16 ER -