TY -的AU -杨,个AU -侯,Mengchi AU -锣,雪盟——郭,瑞盟——冯,邢林盟——田,鲁伊PY - 2022 DA - 2022/10/26 TI -质量评估高血压治疗相关信息在微信:横断面研究乔- J地中海互联网Res SP - e38567六世- 24 KW - 10 KW -质量评估——高血压KW -微信KW -辨别乐器AB -背景:微信平台已成为中国医疗信息的主要来源。然而，目前还没有研究探讨微信治疗高血压这一主要慢性疾病的信息质量。目的:本研究旨在从可信度、具体性、准确性和完整性等方面探讨微信相关高血压治疗文章的信息质量。方法:我们基于几种纳入和排除标准，搜索微信上所有与高血压治疗相关的信息。我们使用两种工具来评估信息质量，由两名独立评审员分别使用这两种工具进行评估。首先，我们采用DISCERN工具对治疗信息的可信度和具体性进行评估，将结果分为优秀、良好、一般、较差和极差五个等级。其次，我们采用中国高血压防治指南(2018年版)对具体医疗内容的文章信息的准确性和完整性进行评估。第三，我们将两种评估的结果结合起来，以得出文章的整体质量，并探讨两种独立评估之间的差异和关联。结果:检索到的223篇文章中，全文收录130篇(58.3%)。在这130篇文章中，81篇(62.3%)描述了高血压的治疗措施。 The assessment based on the DISCERN instrument reported a mean score of 31.22 (SD 8.46). There were no articles rated excellent (mean score >63); most (111/130, 85.4%) of the articles did not refer to the consequences—in particular, quality of life—of no treatment. For specific medical content, adherence to the Chinese Guidelines for Prevention and Treatment of Hypertension was generally low in terms of accuracy and completeness, and there was much erroneous information. The overall mean quality score was 10.18 (SD 2.22) for the 130 articles, and the scores differed significantly across the 3 types (P=.03) and 5 sources (P=.02). Articles with references achieved higher scores for quality than those reporting none (P<.001). The results from the DISCERN assessment and the medical content scores were highly correlated (ρ=0.58; P<.001). Conclusions: The quality of hypertension treatment–related information on the WeChat platform is low. Future work is warranted to regulate information sources and strengthen references. For the treatment of hypertension, crucial information on the consequences of no treatment is urgently needed. SN - 1438-8871 UR - //www.mybigtv.com/2022/10/e38567 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/38567 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36287598 DO - 10.2196/38567 ID - info:doi/10.2196/38567 ER -