TY -的盟Wawrzuta杜米尼克AU - Jaworski律师事务所,科学家们盟——Gotlib乔安娜AU - Panczyk,科学家们PY - 2021 DA - 2021/6/4 TI -反对疫苗接种的消息在社会媒体的特点:系统回顾乔- J地中海互联网Res SP - e24564六世- 23 - 6千瓦接种KW——社交媒体KW -反疫苗运动KW -疫苗接种拒绝KW -健康传播KW -公共卫生KW -疫苗AB -背景:反疫苗运动的支持者可以很容易地在社交媒体上传播未经科学证明的信息。因此，更多地了解他们的帖子和活动有助于有效地对他们发布的虚假信息作出反应和回应，这些虚假信息旨在劝阻人们接种疫苗。目的:本研究旨在收集、评估和综合与抗疫苗社交媒体用户基于网络活动的知识现状相关的证据。方法:我们系统地回顾了来自3个数据库(Scopus、Web of Science和PubMed)的英文论文。建立数据提取表，包括作者、发表年份、具体目标、研究设计、比较和显著性结果。我们对纳入的研究进行了综合叙述。结果:该搜索策略共检索到731条记录。经过重复和合格性筛选，18篇文章被纳入定性综合。虽然大多数作者分析的是短信，但也有一些人研究了图像或视频。 In addition, although most of the studies examined vaccines in general, 5 focused specifically on human papillomavirus vaccines, 2 on measles vaccines, and 1 on influenza vaccines. The synthesized studies dealt with the popularity of provaccination and antivaccination content, the style and manner in which messages about vaccines were formulated for the users, a range of topics concerning vaccines (harmful action, limited freedom of choice, and conspiracy theories), and the role and activity of bots in the dissemination of these messages in social media. Conclusions: Proponents of the antivaccine movement use a limited number of arguments in their messages; therefore, it is possible to prepare publications clarifying doubts and debunking the most common lies. Public health authorities should continuously monitor social media to quickly find new antivaccine arguments and then create information campaigns for both health professionals and other users. SN - 1438-8871 UR - //www.mybigtv.com/2021/6/e24564 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/24564 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34085943 DO - 10.2196/24564 ID - info:doi/10.2196/24564 ER -