TY - JOUR AU - Ebert, David Daniel AU - Franke, Marvin AU - Zarski, Anna-Carlotta AU - Berking, Matthias AU - Riper, Heleen AU - Cuijpers, Pim AU - Funk, Burkhardt AU - Lehr, Dirk PY - 2021 DA - 2021/12/22 TI -基于互联网的移动支持的压力管理干预作为一种通用预防方法的有效性和调节者:随机对照试验JO - J Med Internet Res SP - e22107 VL - 23 IS - 12kw -压力管理干预KW -通用预防KW -职业健康KW -调节因子AB -背景:新证据表明基于互联网的移动支持的压力管理干预(iSMIs)对高压力员工的有效性。然而，目前尚不清楚，如果没有更类似于常规职业卫生保健的普遍预防方法的预选过程，ismi是否也有效。此外，关于哪些人适合ismi，而哪些人不适合ismi的证据很少。目的:本研究的目的是评价iSMI GET。在没有基线纳入标准的普遍预防方法中的压力，并检查干预效果的调节因子。方法:将396名员工随机分为干预组和6个月等待名单对照组。iSMI包括7个疗程和1个强化疗程，没有提供治疗指导。在基线、7周和随机化后6个月评估自我报告数据。主要结果是感知压力。 Several a priori defined moderators were explored as potential effect modifiers. Results: Participants in the intervention group reported significantly lower perceived stress at posttreatment (d=0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.91) and at 6-month follow-up (d=0.61, 95% CI 0.41-0.81) compared to those in the waiting list control group. Significant differences with medium-to-large effect sizes were found for all mental health and most work-related outcomes. Resilience (at 7 weeks, P=.04; at 6 months, P=.01), agreeableness (at 7 weeks, P=.01), psychological strain (at 6 months, P=.04), and self-regulation (at 6 months, P=.04) moderated the intervention effects. Conclusions: This study indicates that iSMIs can be effective in a broad range of employees with no need for preselection to achieve substantial effects. The subgroups that might not profit had extreme values on the respective measures and represented only a very small proportion of the investigated sample, thereby indicating the broad applicability of GET.ON Stress. Trial Registration: German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00005699; https://www.drks.de/DRKS00005699 SN - 1438-8871 UR - //www.mybigtv.com/2021/12/e22107 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/22107 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34941541 DO - 10.2196/22107 ID - info:doi/10.2196/22107 ER -