TY -的盟斜斜地云雨AU -汤普森,乔恩•肖AU - Esi E AU - Chen Xiwei AU - Golzarri-Arroyo,莉莲PY - 2021 DA - 2021/10/14 TI -信任科学干预减少相信COVID-19错误信息和增加COVID-19预防行为意图:随机对照试验乔- J地中海互联网Res SP - e32425六世- 23 - 10 KW - infodemic KW -错误KW -信任科学KW - COVID-19 KW -个随机对照试验KW -随机对照试验AB -背景:对科学的信任有助于我们理解人们对错误信息的信仰，以及他们采取行动预防COVID-19的意图。然而，目前还没有实验研究试图干预这一变量，以制定针对COVID-19信息大流行的可扩展应对措施。目的:我们的研究考察了短暂接触有关科学过程的信息图是否会增加对科学的信任，从而影响对错误信息的信任和对COVID-19采取预防措施的意愿。方法:这项两组、平行组、随机对照试验旨在使用多产平台招募1000名具有代表性的成年人样本，按年龄、种族/民族和性别划分。参与者被随机分配观看有关科学过程的干预信息图或对照信息图。干预信息图是通过单独的试点研究设计的。主要结果是对科学的信任、COVID-19叙事信念概况和COVID-19预防行为意图。我们还收集了12个协变量，并将它们纳入所有分析中。所有结果均通过网络评估收集。 Results: From January 22, 2021 to January 24, 2021, 1017 participants completed the study. The intervention slightly improved trust in science (difference-in-difference 0.03, SE 0.01, t1000=2.16, P=.031). No direct intervention effect was observed on belief profile membership, but there was some evidence of an indirect intervention effect mediated by trust in science (adjusted odds ratio 1.06, SE 0.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.12, z=2.01, P=.045) on membership in the “scientific” profile compared with the others. No direct nor indirect effects on preventive behaviors were observed. Conclusions: Briefly viewing an infographic about science appeared to cause a small aggregate increase in trust in science, which may have, in turn, reduced the believability of COVID-19 misinformation. The effect sizes were small but commensurate with our 60-second, highly scalable intervention approach. Researchers should study the potential for truthful messaging about how science works to serve as misinformation inoculation and test how best to do so. Trial Registration: NCT04557241; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04557241 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): RR2-10.2196/24383 SN - 1438-8871 UR - //www.mybigtv.com/2021/10/e32425 UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/32425 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34581678 DO - 10.2196/32425 ID - info:doi/10.2196/32425 ER -