TY - JOUR AU - Pike, C William AU - Zillioux, Jacqueline AU - Rapp, David PY - 2019 DA - 2019/07/02 TI -泌尿科医生在线评级:综合分析JO - J Med Internet Res SP - e12436 VL - 21 IS - 7 KW -在线医生评级KW -泌尿科KW -声誉管理AB -背景:医生评级网站正越来越多地被患者用于帮助指导医生的选择。因此，了解这些网站和影响评分的因素对医生来说是有价值的。目的:我们试图对在线泌尿科评分信息进行综合分析，特别关注评分或评论数量与整体医生评分之间的关系。方法:我们分析了在Healthgrades网站上泌尿科医生的评分。数据检索集中在医生和工作人员评分信息。我们的分析包括医生和员工评分的描述性统计，以及医生或员工绩效与整体医生评分之间的相关性分析。最后，我们进行了最佳拟合分析，以评估医生评分数量和总体评分之间的联系。结果:从总共分析的9921个泌尿学档案中，有99,959个评分和23,492个评论。大多数评分是5(“优秀”)(67.53%，67,505/99,959)或1(差)(24.22%，24,218/99,959)。所有医生和员工的绩效评分与整体医生评分呈显著正相关(P< 0.001)。所有分析均为001)。 Best-fit analysis demonstrated a negative relationship between number of ratings or comments and overall rating until physicians achieved 21 ratings or 6 comments. Thereafter, a positive relationship was seen. Conclusions: In our study, a dichotomous rating distribution was seen with more than 90% of ratings being either excellent or poor. A negative relationship between number of ratings or comments and overall rating was initially seen, after which a positive relationship was demonstrated. Combined, these data suggest that physicians can benefit from understanding online ratings and that proactive steps to encourage patient rating submissions may help optimize overall rating. SN - 1438-8871 UR - //www.mybigtv.com/2019/7/e12436/ UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/12436 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31267982 DO - 10.2196/12436 ID - info:doi/10.2196/12436 ER -