TY - JOUR AU - Bjornestad, Jone AU - Hegelstad, Wenche Ten Velden AU - Berg, Henrik AU - Davidson, Larry AU - Joa, Inge AU - Johannessen, Jan Olav AU - Melle, Ingrid AU - Stain, Helen J AU - Pallesen, Ståle PY - 2019 DA - 2019/06/28 TI -精神病中的社会媒体与社会功能:系统评价JO - J医学互联网Res SP - e13957 VL - 21 IS - 6kw -精神病KW -精神分裂症KW -社交媒体KW -社会功能KW -测量KW -评估KW -系统评价AB -背景:精神病患者是社交媒体的重度消费者。目前尚不清楚社交功能的衡量标准在多大程度上包含了在线社交活动的衡量标准。目的:研究将社交媒体活动纳入精神病患者社会功能和精神病超高风险(UHR)的测量中。方法:两名独立作者使用以下电子数据库进行了检索:Epistemonikos、Cochrane系统评价数据库、疗效评价摘要数据库、MEDLINE、Embase和PsycINFO。纳入的文章必须符合以下所有标准:(1)在同行评审期刊上以英文发表的实证研究;(2)该研究包括客观或主观的离线(即非网络媒介接触)和/或在线社会功能(即网络媒介接触)的测量;(3)社会功能测量必须用于符合精神障碍或精神病UHR标准的样本(即《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》或《国际疾病分类》);(4)该研究发表于2004年1月至2019年2月之间。Facebook是2004年推出的第一个大型社交媒体平台，因此，在2004年之前进行的研究几乎不可能包括对社交媒体活动的测量。 Results: The electronic search resulted in 11,844 distinct articles. Full-text evaluation was conducted on 719 articles, of which 597 articles met inclusion criteria. A total of 58 social functioning measures were identified. With some exceptions, reports on reliability and validity were scarce, and only one measure integrated social media social activity. Conclusions: The ecological validity of social functioning measures is challenged by the lack of assessment of social media activity, as it fails to reflect an important aspect of the current social reality of persons with psychosis. Measures should be revised to include social media activity and thus avoid the clinical consequences of inadequate assessment of social functioning. Trial Registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) CRD42017058514; http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?ID=CRD42017058514 SN - 1438-8871 UR - //www.mybigtv.com/2019/6/e13957/ UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/13957 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31254338 DO - 10.2196/13957 ID - info:doi/10.2196/13957 ER -