TY -的盟Maben-Feaster Rosalyn E AU -斯坦斯菲尔德,R布伦特AU - Opipari,安玛丽盟——此前,玛雅M PY - 2018 DA - 2018/03/12 TI - Twitter的提供者专业评估病人的观点在学术妇产科诊所:病人调查乔- J地中海互联网Res SP - e78六世- 20 - 3 KW -病人KW -社交网站KW -专业千瓦调查和问卷KW -感知KW - Twitter AB -背景:三分之一的美国人使用社交媒体网站作为医疗保健信息的来源。Twitter是一个微博网站，允许用户在网上发布280个字符的帖子(或推文)，它正在成为一个重要的医疗保健社交媒体平台。然而，社交媒体上的大多数医疗专业指南都是基于专家意见。目的:本研究旨在研究提供者推特上带有教育性推文的简介是否被视为比带有个人推文或两者混合的简介更专业，并确定提供者性别对学术妇产科诊所的专业观念的影响。方法:本研究随机选取了密歇根大学Von Voigtlander诊所的妇产科患者，让他们查看六个医疗提供者的Twitter档案中的一个，这些档案在提供者性别和推文性质上有所不同。每位参与者都回答了10个问题，是关于他们基于Twitter个人资料内容对提供者专业程度的看法。结果:仅带有教育推文的提供者简介比带有个人推文的简介获得更高的平均专业度得分。具体来说，专门发布教育推文的女性和男性提供者的总体平均专业度评分最高，分别为4.24和3.85。此外，在内容相同的情况下，女性提供者档案比男性提供者档案获得了更高的平均专业评级。 The female profile with mixed content received a mean professionalism rating of 3.38 compared to 3.24 for the male mixed-content profile, and the female profile with only personal content received a mean professionalism rating of 3.68 compared to 2.68 for the exclusively personal male provider profile. Conclusions: This study showed that in our obstetrics and gynecology clinic, patients perceived providers with educational profiles as more professional than those with a mixture of educational and personal tweets or only personal tweets. It also showed that our patient population perceived the female provider with educational tweets to be the most professional. This study will help inform the development of evidence-based guidelines for social media use in medicine as it adds to the growing body of literature examining professionalism and social media. SN - 1438-8871 UR - //www.mybigtv.com/2018/3/e78/ UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.8056 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29530838 DO - 10.2196/jmir.8056 ID - info:doi/10.2196/jmir.8056 ER -