TY - JOUR AU - Meurk, Carla AU - Leung, Janni AU - Hall, Wayne AU - Head, Brian W AU - Whiteford, Harvey PY - 2016 DA - 2016/01/13 TI -在澳大利亚建立和管理电子精神卫生保健:系统回顾的挑战和呼吁Policy-Focussed研究乔- J地中海互联网Res SP - e10六世——18 - 1 KW -远程医疗千瓦e-health KW - e-mental健康KW - e-therapy KW -互联网KW -在线KW -认知行为疗法KW -焦虑KW -焦虑症千瓦抑郁KW -抑郁症KW -澳大利亚KW -研究翻译KW -阐述循证政策KW -实现AB -背景:越来越多的证据证明电子精神卫生服务的有效性。关于如何促进安全、有效和可持续地实施这些服务的证据较少。目的:我们对抑郁症和焦虑症电子心理健康服务的使用进行了系统综述，以为政策制定提供信息，并确定证据库中与政策相关的差距。方法:遵循PRISMA协议，我们确定了(1)在澳大利亚进行的研究，(2)关于电子精神健康服务，(3)针对抑郁症或焦虑症，以及(4)关于电子精神健康使用，如使用障碍和促进因素。检索的数据库包括Cochrane、PubMed、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Embase、ProQuest Social Science和谷歌Scholar。来源根据地区和政策相关性水平进行评估。结果:检索结果为1081项研究;纳入30项研究进行分析。 Most reported on self-selected samples and samples of online help-seekers. Studies indicate that e-mental health services are predominantly used by females, and those who are more educated and socioeconomically advantaged. Ethnicity was infrequently reported on. Studies examining consumer preferences found a preference for face-to-face therapy over e-therapies, but not an aversion to e-therapy. Content relevant to governance was predominantly related to the organizational dimensions of e-mental health services, followed by implications for community education. Financing and payment for e-services and governance of the information communication technology were least commonly discussed. Conclusions: Little research focuses explicitly on policy development and implementation planning; most research provides an e-services perspective. Research is needed to provide community and policy-maker perspectives. General population studies of prospective treatment seekers that include ethnicity and socioeconomic status and quantify relative preferences for all treatment modalities are necessary. SN - 1438-8871 UR - //www.mybigtv.com/2016/1/e10/ UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4827 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26764181 DO - 10.2196/jmir.4827 ID - info:doi/10.2196/jmir.4827 ER -