TY - JOUR AU - Selby, Peter AU - Goncharenko, Karina AU - Barker, Megan AU - Fahim, Myra AU - Timothy, Valerie AU - Dragonetti, Rosa AU - Kemper, Katherine AU - Herie, Marilyn AU - Hays，J泰勒PY - 2015 DA - 2015/04/17 TI -审查和评估在线烟草依赖治疗培训计划的医疗保健从业人员JO - J医疗互联网Res SP - e97 VL - 17 IS - 4kw -远程教育KW -烟草使用KW -医疗保健KW -戒烟KW -烟草依赖KW -项目评估KW -继续医学教育AB -背景:培训卫生保健专业人员与提高提供循证戒烟干预措施的能力和提高患者的戒烟率有关。在线培训项目承诺提供培训，但现有项目的质量和可用性仍然存在问题。目的:目的是评估在烟草依赖治疗英语在线课程的质量使用一个有效的仪器。方法:使用谷歌搜索引擎进行环境扫描，以确定可用的在线烟草依赖治疗课程。然后使用在线学习的同行评审标准对确定的课程进行评估，该标准是根据其评估教学设计的能力选择的。它也有明确和简明的标准说明，以确保训练有素的专家评价的一致性。结果:共确定了39门课程，其中24门课程在评估期间根据其可达性和功能性进行了评估。总体而言，课程评级显示，24门课程中有17门未能达到最低质量标准，没有一门课程被评为优质。 However, many excelled in providing effective navigation, course rationale, and content. Many were weak in the use of instructional design elements, such as teaching effectiveness, learning strategies, instructor’s role, and assessment and evaluation. Evaluation results and suggestions for improvement were shared with course administrators. Conclusions: Based on the courses evaluated in this review, course developers are encouraged to employ best practices in instructional design, such as cohesiveness of material, linearity of design, practice exercises, problem solving, and ongoing evaluation to improve existing courses and in the design of new online learning opportunities. SN - 1438-8871 UR - //www.mybigtv.com/2015/4/e97/ UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3284 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25887187 DO - 10.2196/jmir.3284 ID - info:doi/10.2196/jmir.3284 ER -