TY -非盟的挥拳相向,马丁AU -哈林舞,弗兰克AU -迈耶,Florian PY - 2015 DA - 2015/01/12 TI -评估牙医的德国医生评级网站:评级的分析乔- J地中海互联网Res SP - e15六世- 17 - 1 KW -医生评级网站KW -牙医KW -患者的护理质量经验KW -互联网KW - AB -背景:医生评级网站已得到实践和研究的重要性。然而，没有证据表明患者在医生评级网站上对牙医的评级。目的:本研究的目的是对德国医生评级网站上的牙医在2年内的评级进行全面分析。方法:分析德国医生评级网站(Jameda) 2012年至2013年对所有牙医的评级。可用的数据集包含72,758名患者的23,902名牙医的76,456个评级。其他信息包括5个必填题的总分和分，牙医的医学专业和性别，以及患者的年龄、性别和健康保险状况。采用中位数检验和Kendall tau-b检验进行统计学分析。结果:在研究期间，德国所有牙医的44.57%(23,902/53,626)在医生评级网站Jameda上进行了评估。评分由2012年的28843项上升至2013年的47613项，增幅达65.08%。其中，45.37%(10845 / 23902)的牙医被评为1次，43.41%(10376 / 23902)的牙医被评为2 ~ 5次，11.21%(2681/ 23902)的牙医被评为6次以上(均值3.16，标准差5.57)。 Approximately 90% (21,324/23,902, 89.21%) of dentists received a very good or good overall rating, whereas only 3.02% (721/23,902) were rated with the lowest scores. Better ratings were given either by female or older patients, or by those covered by private health insurance. The best-rated specialty was pediatric dentistry; the lowest ratings were given to orthodontists. Finally, dentists were rated slightly lower in 2013 compared to 2012 (P=.01). Conclusions: The rise in the number of ratings for dentists demonstrates the increasing popularity of physician rating websites and the need for information about health care providers. Future research should assess whether social media, especially Web-based ratings, are suitable in practice for patients and other stakeholders in health care (eg, insurance providers) to reflect the clinical quality of care. SN - 1438-8871 UR - //www.mybigtv.com/2015/1/e15/ UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3830 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25582914 DO - 10.2196/jmir.3830 ID - info:doi/10.2196/jmir.3830 ER -