TY - JOUR AU - Kalz, Marco AU - Lenssen, Niklas AU - Felzen, Marc AU - Rossaint, Rolf AU - Tabuenca, Bernardo AU - Specht, Marcus AU - Skorning, Max PY - 2014 DA - 2014/03/19 TI -用于心肺复苏训练和真实事件支持的智能手机应用程序:一项混合方法评估研究JO - J Med Internet Res SP - e89 VL - 16 IS - 3kw -基本生命支持(BLS) KW -心肺复苏(CPR) KW -胸外按压(ECC) KW -智能手机应用程序KW -手机KW -移动健康AB -背景:迄今为止，还没有用于复苏训练和真实事件支持的智能手机/移动应用程序的系统评估。为了为应用程序的开发提供医疗、可用性和其他质量标准，我们结合医疗专家和最终用户的观点进行了混合方法的顺序评估。目的:本研究旨在从专家和最终用户的角度评估当前用于心肺复苏(CPR)培训和真实事件支持的移动应用程序的质量。方法:两位独立的医学专家对谷歌Play商店和苹果应用商店的CPR应用程序的医疗内容进行了评估。评估是根据现行基本生命支持(BLS)指南预先规定的最低医疗含量要求进行的。在第二阶段，非医疗终端用户测试了至少满足最低要求的应用程序的可用性和吸引力。可用性评估采用系统可用性量表(SUS);他们用自己开发的“反应甲板”工具包来衡量吸引力。结果:在61个应用程序中，有46个被纳入专家评估。 A consolidated list of 13 apps resulted for the following layperson evaluation. The interrater reliability was substantial (kappa=.61). Layperson end-users (n=14) had a high interrater reliability (intraclass correlation 1 [ICC1]=.83, P<.001, 95% CI 0.75-0.882 and ICC2=.79, P<.001, 95% CI 0.695-0.869). Their evaluation resulted in a list of 5 recommendable apps. Conclusions: Although several apps for resuscitation training and real incident support are available, very few are designed according to current BLS guidelines and offer an acceptable level of usability and hedonic quality for laypersons. The results of this study are intended to optimize the development of CPR mobile apps. The app ranking supports the informed selection of mobile apps for training situations and CPR campaigns as well as for real incident support. SN - 14388871 UR - //www.mybigtv.com/2014/3/e89/ UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2951 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24647361 DO - 10.2196/jmir.2951 ID - info:doi/10.2196/jmir.2951 ER -