TY - JOUR AU - Wang,刘普AU - Wang, Juexin AU - Wang, Michael AU - Li, Yong AU - Liang, Yanchun AU - Xu, Dong PY - 2012 DA - 2012/05/16 TI -使用互联网搜索引擎获取医疗信息的比较研究JO - J Med Internet Res SP - e74 VL - 14 IS - 3kw -互联网搜索KW -页面排名KW -谷歌,Yahoo!, Bing, Ask.com KW -医疗信息KW -健康信息查找KW -乳腺癌KW - SNOMED CT KW -用户体验评估KW -可用性测试KW -走廊测试KW -软件工程AB -背景:互联网已成为获取健康和医疗信息的最重要手段之一。这通常是检查疾病及其治疗的基本信息的第一步。搜索结果通常对普通用户有用。各种搜索引擎,如谷歌,雅虎!、必应和Ask.com可以在为医疗专业人士和非专业人士获取医疗信息方面发挥重要作用。然而,各种搜索引擎对医疗信息的可用性和有效性还没有得到全面的比较和评估。目的:比较各大互联网搜索引擎在获取医疗卫生信息方面的可用性。方法:我们将可用性测试作为软件工程技术和标准行业实践来比较四个主要的搜索引擎(谷歌,Yahoo!, Bing和Ask.com)来获取健康和医疗信息。为此,我们在谷歌,Yahoo!并保存了来自每个搜索引擎的前200个链接的结果。 We combined nonredundant links from the four search engines and gave them to volunteer users in an alphabetical order. The volunteer users evaluated the websites and scored each website from 0 to 10 (lowest to highest) based on the usefulness of the content relevant to breast cancer. A medical expert identified six well-known websites related to breast cancer in advance as standards. We also used five keywords associated with breast cancer defined in the latest release of Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine-Clinical Terms (SNOMED CT) and analyzed their occurrence in the websites. Results: Each search engine provided rich information related to breast cancer in the search results. All six standard websites were among the top 30 in search results of all four search engines. Google had the best search validity (in terms of whether a website could be opened), followed by Bing, Ask.com, and Yahoo!. The search results highly overlapped between the search engines, and the overlap between any two search engines was about half or more. On the other hand, each search engine emphasized various types of content differently. In terms of user satisfaction analysis, volunteer users scored Bing the highest for its usefulness, followed by Yahoo!, Google, and Ask.com. Conclusions: Google, Yahoo!, Bing, and Ask.com are by and large effective search engines for helping lay users get health and medical information. Nevertheless, the current ranking methods have some pitfalls and there is room for improvement to help users get more accurate and useful information. We suggest that search engine users explore multiple search engines to search different types of health information and medical knowledge for their own needs and get a professional consultation if necessary. SN - 1438-8871 UR - //www.mybigtv.com/2012/3/e74/ UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1943 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22672889 DO - 10.2196/jmir.1943 ID - info:doi/10.2196/jmir.1943 ER -
Baidu
map