TY -的盟Donkin Liesje AU -克里斯坦森,海伦AU -奈史密斯,Sharon L AU - Neal,布鲁斯AU - Hickie,伊恩·B非盟- Glozier尼克PY - 2011 DA - 2011/08/05 TI -依从性的影响的系统评价的有效性e-Therapies乔- J地中海互联网Res SP - e52六世- 13 - 3 KW -坚持KW -持久性KW -在线治疗KW - e-therapy千瓦系统回顾AB -背景:随着电子疗法越来越受欢迎，支持其有效性的文献也越来越多。然而，这些干预措施往往受到高流失率和不同水平的用户坚持的困扰。了解依从性的作用可能对理解程序使用如何影响电子治疗干预的有效性至关重要。目的:本研究的目的是系统地回顾电子治疗文献，以(1)描述用于评估依从性的方法，(2)评估依从性与这些干预结果的相关性。方法:在疾病状态和行为目标之间进行了电子治疗干预的系统回顾。收集了关于依从性测量、结果和探索依从性测量和结果之间关系的分析的数据。结果:在69项报告了依从性测量的研究中，只有33项(48%)研究了依从性与结果之间的关系。登录数量是最常见的依从性指标，其次是完成的模块数量。依从性和结果测量的异质性限制了分析。 However, logins appeared to be the measure of adherence most consistently related to outcomes in physical health interventions, while module completion was found to be most related to outcomes in psychological health interventions. Conclusions: There is large variation in the reporting of adherence and the association of adherence with outcomes. A lack of agreement about how best to measure adherence is likely to contribute to the variation in findings. Physical and psychological outcomes seem influenced by different types of adherence. A composite measure encompassing time online, activity completion, and active engagements with the intervention may be the best measure of adherence. Further research is required to establish a consensus for measuring adherence and to understand the role of adherence in influencing outcomes. SN - 1438-8871 UR - //www.mybigtv.com/2011/3/e52/ UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1772 UR - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21821503 DO - 10.2196/jmir.1772 ID - info:doi/10.2196/jmir.1772 ER -