TY -的盟Kroeze Willemieke盟——Oenema Anke AU -坎贝尔,玛莎盟——Brug Johannes PY - 2008 DA - 2008/4/29 TI -比较的使用和欣赏Print-Delivered与CD-ROM-Delivered Computer-Tailored干预针对饱和脂肪摄入量:随机对照试验乔- J地中海互联网Res SP - e12汽油六世- 10 - 2 KW -计算机KW -互联网KW -裁剪KW -流程评估KW -人口差异KW -饮食KW - AB营养教育背景:计算机定制的健康教育是一种很有前途的健康教育技术，正越来越多地通过交互式方式进行，例如通过互联网进行。有人认为，在使用和欣赏计算机定制干预措施的印刷和交互式交付之间可能存在差异，这可能会影响信息处理。对于妇女、老年人和社会经济地位较低的人来说尤其如此。了解使用和欣赏的差异有助于为特定的目标受众选择适当的交付模式。目的:该研究调查了一种内容相同的计算机定制干预措施，通过打印或CD-ROM提供饱和脂肪摄入量。我们分析了消费者对反馈信息的使用和欣赏，并探讨了性别、年龄和教育程度是否存在可能的差异。方法:健康的荷兰成年人(18-65岁)，没有人正在接受高胆固醇血症的治疗，随机分配接受计算机定制的CD-ROM (n = 151)或印刷的程序(n = 141)。基线时，收集性别、年龄和教育水平的数据。干预后一个月，收集了关于反馈的使用(阅读、保存、讨论)和评价(可信度、感知个性化、感知个人相关性和用户友好性)的数据。 Statistical analyses on the use and appreciation items were performed using chi-square tests and independent-samples t tests. Results: After exclusion of individuals with missing values, a total of 257 and 240 respondents were included in the analyses of the use outcomes of feedback read and saved, respectively. The results indicate that among the total population, the print feedback was read more often than the CD-ROM feedback (95% vs 81%; P = .001) and saved more often than the CD-ROM feedback (97% vs 77%; P < .001). Similar results were found among the gender, age, and education subgroups. After exclusion of individuals who did not read the information and those with missing values, a total of 208-223 respondents were included in the analyses of the use outcome of feedback discussed and the appreciation items. The personal relevance of the print feedback was rated higher than for the CD-ROM-delivered feedback (0.97 vs 0.68; P = .04), but the effect size was small (0.28). These differences in personal relevance were also seen among women (1.06 vs 0.67; P = .04) and respondents aged 35-49 years (1.00 vs 0.58; P = .03), with moderate effect sizes (0.38 and 0.44, respectively). Conclusions: Despite the possible advantages of interactive feedback, the present study indicates that interactive-delivered feedback was used less and perceived as less personally relevant compared to the print-delivered feedback. These differences in use and appreciation of delivery modes should be taken into consideration when selecting a delivery mode for a specific subgroup in order to optimize exposure. Trial Registration: ISRCTN 01557410; http://www.webcitation.org/5XMylWleH SN - 1438-8871 UR - //www.mybigtv.com/2008/2/e12/ UR - https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.940 DO - 10.2196/jmir.940 ID - info:doi/10.2196/jmir.940 ER -