%0期刊文章%@ 1438-8871 %I JMIR出版物%V 24%卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析 N 10% P e39555 %T治疗和管理外周动脉疾病和间歇性跛行方面易获得的基于互联网的信息的可信度、准确性和全面性:综述%A Alexander,Shelley %A Seenan,Chris %+格拉斯哥加里东尼亚大学健康与生命科学学院物理治疗和辅助医学系，格拉斯哥G4 0BA，英国，44 1413318151,chris.seenan@gcu.ac.uk %K外周动脉疾病%K间歇性跛行%K健康信息%K教育%K互联网%K电子健康%K数字健康%D 2022 %7 17.10.2022 %9综述%J J医学互联网Res %G英语%X背景:外周动脉疾病(PAD)影响着全球数百万人，这种疾病管理的核心组成部分是自我管理。互联网是许多人获取健康信息的重要来源。然而，网站上关于PAD治疗建议的内容尚未得到充分评估。目的:本研究旨在评估通过一个通用搜索引擎找到的网站的可信度、准确性和全面性，将其内容与目前治疗和管理PAD和间歇性跛行(IC)的指南进行比较。方法:对美国和英国的医院、大学、政府、消费者组织和专业协会的网站进行了审查。网站上关于外周动脉疾病和IC的治疗建议是按照国家健康和护理卓越研究所(NICE)和美国心脏协会(AHA)的指导方针编码的。主要结果包括网站可信度(4项美国医学会杂志基准)、网站准确性(准确推荐的百分比)和网站推荐的全面性(适当涵盖的指南建议的百分比)。次要结果是可读性(Flesch-Kincaid等级水平)和网站质量(网络健康基金会的行为准则)。 Results: After screening, 62 websites were included in this analysis. Only 45% (28/62) of websites met the credibility requirement by stating they were updated after the NICE guidelines were published. Declaration of authorship and funding and the presence of reference lists were less commonly reported. Regarding accuracy, 81% (556/685) of website recommendations were deemed accurate on following NICE’s and the AHA’s recommendations. Comprehensiveness was low, with an average of 40% (25/62) of guideline treatment recommendations being appropriately covered by websites. In most cases, readability scores revealed that the websites were too complex for web-based consumer health information. Conclusions: Web-based information from reputable sources about the treatment and management of PAD and IC are generally accurate but have low comprehensiveness, credibility, and readability. %M 36251363 %R 10.2196/39555 %U //www.mybigtv.com/2022/10/e39555 %U https://doi.org/10.2196/39555 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36251363