期刊文章JMIR出版物调查奖励和存款合同财务激励使用智能手机应用程序改卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析变身体活动行为:随机对照试验%A de Buisonjé，David R %A Reijnders,Thomas %A Cohen Rodrigues,Talia R %A Prabhakaran,Santhanam %A Kowatsch,Tobias %A Lipman,Stefan A %A Bijmolt, tamammo H A %A Breeman,Linda D %A Janssen,Veronica R %A Kraaijenhagen,Roderik A %A Kemps,Hareld M C %A Evers,Andrea W M %+莱顿大学心理研究所健康，医学和神经心理学单位，Wassenaarseweg 52, 2A22室，莱顿，2333 AK，荷兰，31 630665252，d.r.de.buisonje@fsw.leidenuniv.nl %K eHealth %K行为改变%K奖励%K奖励学习%K财务激励%K存款合同%K承诺合同%K身体活动%K手机%D 2022 %7 6.10.2022 %9原始论文%J J医学互联网Res %G英语%X背景:财务激励干预改善身体活动已被证明是有效的，但代价昂贵。存款合同(参与者以自己的钱做抵押)可能是一种负担得起的替代方案。此外，存款合同利用损失厌恶的力量可能具有更好的效果。以前的研究经常通过损失框架经济奖励(不要求押金)来操作存款合同，以模拟存款合同中涉及的损失感觉。目的:本研究旨在理清发生实际损失(通过自筹存款合同)与损失框架的关系。我们调查了激励条件是否比无激励控制条件更有效，存款合同的吸收是否低于财务奖励，存款合同是否比财务奖励更有效，以及损失框架是否比收益框架更有效。方法:健康受试者126名，平均年龄22.7岁(SD 2.84岁)，参加为期20天的体育活动干预。他们下载了一款智能手机应用，该应用为他们提供了个性化的体育锻炼目标，并要求他们预付10欧元(在撰写本文时:1欧元= 0.98美元)押金(可能会丢失)，或者根据表现提供10欧元作为奖励。 Daily feedback on incentive earnings was provided and framed as either a loss or gain. We used a 2 (incentive type: deposit or reward) × 2 (feedback frame: gain or loss) between-subjects factorial design with a no-incentive control condition. Our primary outcome was the number of days participants achieved their goals. The uptake of the intervention was a secondary outcome. Results: Overall, financial incentive conditions (mean 13.10, SD 6.33 days goal achieved) had higher effectiveness than the control condition (mean 8.00, SD 5.65 days goal achieved; P=.002; ηp2=0.147). Deposit contracts had lower uptake (29/47, 62%) than rewards (50/50, 100%; P<.001; Cramer V=0.492). Furthermore, 2-way analysis of covariance showed that deposit contracts (mean 14.88, SD 6.40 days goal achieved) were not significantly more effective than rewards (mean 12.13, SD 6.17 days goal achieved; P=.17). Unexpectedly, loss frames (mean 10.50, SD 6.22 days goal achieved) were significantly less effective than gain frames (mean 14.67, SD 5.95 days goal achieved; P=.007; ηp2=0.155). Conclusions: Financial incentives help increase physical activity, but deposit contracts were not more effective than rewards. Although self-funded deposit contracts can be offered at low cost, low uptake is an important obstacle to large-scale implementation. Unexpectedly, loss framing was less effective than gain framing. Therefore, we urge further research on their boundary conditions before using loss-framed incentives in practice. Because of limited statistical power regarding some research questions, the results of this study should be interpreted with caution, and future work should be done to confirm these findings. Trial Registration: Open Science Framework Registries osf.io/34ygt; https://osf.io/34ygt %M 36201 %R 10.2196/38339 %U //www.mybigtv.com/2022/10/e38339 %U https://doi.org/10.2196/38339 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36201