%0期刊文章%@ 1438-8871 %I JMIR出版物%V 23%卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析 N 3% P e23365% T数字干预措施的证据合成，以减轻COVID-19大流行对公共精神卫生的负面影响:快速元回顾%A Rauschenberg,Christian %A Schick,Anita %A Hirjak,Dusan %A Seidler,Andreas %A Paetzold,Isabell %A Apfelbacher,Christian %A Riedel-Heller,Steffi G %A Reininghaus,Ulrich %+公共精神卫生系，中央精神卫生研究所，曼海姆医学院，海德堡大学，J5，曼海姆，68159，德国，49 62117031929，christian.rauschenberg@zi-mannheim.de %K COVID-19 %K移动卫生%K电子卫生%K远程医疗%K预防%K精神卫生促进%K干预%K数字精神卫生%K数字干预%K公共精神卫生%D 2021 %7 10.3.2021 %9回顾%J J医学互联网决议%G英语%X背景:越来越多的证据表明COVID-19大流行对公共精神卫生有负面影响。近年来开发和评估的数字干预措施可用于减轻这一大流行病的消极后果。然而，缺乏关于使用现有远程医疗和基于互联网(eHealth)和基于应用程序的移动保健(mHealth)干预措施的循证建议。目的:本研究的目的是调查与公共精神卫生服务(即精神卫生促进、预防和治疗精神障碍)相关的数字干预措施的理论和经验基础、用户视角、安全性、有效性和成本效益，这些措施可能有助于减少COVID-19大流行的后果。方法:进行快速meta综述。MEDLINE、PsycINFO和CENTRAL数据库于2020年5月11日进行搜索。研究纳入标准是广泛的、经过深思熟虑的系统综述和荟萃分析，研究了用于健康促进、预防或治疗心理健康状况的数字工具以及可能受COVID-19大流行影响的决定因素。结果:总体而言，共确定了815篇同行评议的系统综述和荟萃分析，其中83篇符合纳入标准。 Our findings suggest that there is good evidence on the usability, safety, acceptance/satisfaction, and effectiveness of eHealth interventions. Evidence on mHealth apps is promising, especially if social components (eg, blended care) and strategies to promote adherence are incorporated. Although most digital interventions focus on the prevention or treatment of mental disorders, there is some evidence on mental health promotion. However, evidence on process quality, cost-effectiveness, and long-term effects is very limited. Conclusions: There is evidence that digital interventions are particularly suited to mitigating psychosocial consequences at the population level. In times of physical distancing, quarantine, and restrictions on social contacts, decision makers should develop digital strategies for continued mental health care and invest time and efforts in the development and implementation of mental health promotion and prevention programs. %M 33606657 %R 10.2196/23365 %U //www.mybigtv.com/2021/3/e23365 %U https://doi.org/10.2196/23365 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33606657

map