%0期刊文章%@ 1438- 8871% I JMIR出版物%V 23卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析% N 12% P e26763% T用移动应用程序评估医生对工作时间的回忆偏差:访谈与应用记录数据比较%王小汉%林玉生%+国家卫生研究院人口健康科学研究所，苗栗县竹南镇科安路35号，35053，台湾，886 37 206 166 ext 36383, yuhsuanlin@nhri.edu.tw %K智能手机%K移动应用%K工作时间%K回忆偏差%K时间感知%K医生%K劳动政策%D 2021 %7 24.12.2021 %9原论文%J J医学互联网Res %G英文%X背景:之前的研究表明，自我报告工作时间的准确性存在不一致性。然而，准确的工时记录是制定劳动政策的基础。严格的工作时间政策减少了医疗事故，改善了患者的安全，并促进了医生的健康。目的:本研究旨在通过手机应用评估医生对工作时间的回忆偏倚，并探讨回忆偏倚与医生工作时间之间的关系。方法:我们通过计算前一周和倒数第二周应用程序记录和自我报告的工作时间之间的差异来量化回忆偏倚。我们招募了18名医生，安装了“工作时间”app，自动记录gps定义的工作时间，持续2个月，贡献了1068人日。我们研究了工作时间和两个回忆偏差指标之间的关系:(1)自我报告的工作时间和应用程序记录的工作时间之间的差异;(2)在访谈中无法准确回忆起工作时间的天数百分比。结果:应用程序记录的工作时间与自我报告的工作时间高度相关(r=0.86-0.88, P<.001)。 Self-reported work hours were consistently significantly lower than app-recorded hours by –8.97 (SD 8.60) hours and –6.48 (SD 8.29) hours for the previous week and the penultimate week, respectively (both P<.001). The difference for the previous week was significantly correlated with work hours in the previous week (r=–0.410, P=.01), whereas the correlation of the difference with the hours in the penultimate week was not significant (r=–0.119, P=.48). The percentage of hours not recalled (38.6%) was significantly higher for the penultimate week (38.6%) than for the first week (16.0%), and the former was significantly correlated with work hours of the penultimate week (r=0.489, P=.002) Conclusions: Our study identified the existence of recall bias of work hours, the extent to which the recall was biased, and the influence of work hours on recall bias. %M 34951600 %R 10.2196/26763 %U //www.mybigtv.com/2021/12/e26763 %U https://doi.org/10.2196/26763 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34951600