糖尿病自我管理应用程序和数字干预的方法和评价标准:卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析系统评价%A Larbi,Dillys %A Randine,Pietro %A Årsand,Eirik %A Antypas,Konstantinos %A Bradway,Meghan %A Gabarron,Elia %+挪威电子卫生研究中心，北挪威大学医院，Forskningsparken i Breivika 3楼，Sykehusveien 23，特罗姆瑟，9019，挪威，47 91193393，meghan.bradway@ehealthresearch.no %K自我管理%K糖尿病%K移动应用程序%K计算机通信网络%K mHealth %K eHealth %K医疗保健评估机制%D 2020 %7 6.7.2020 %9 Review %J J Med Internet Res %G English %X背景:越来越多的证据表明应用程序和数字干预对糖尿病自我管理有积极的影响。因此，糖尿病患者的标准自我管理可以通过应用程序和数字干预来补充，以提高患者的技能。一些倡议、模型和框架建议如何评估健康应用程序和数字干预措施，但这方面的标准很少。尽管有许多方法可以评估应用程序和数字干预措施，但可能需要一种更具体的方法来评估数字糖尿病自我管理干预措施。目的:本综述旨在确定用于评估糖尿病自我管理应用程序和数字干预措施的方法和标准，并描述患者如何参与这些评估。方法:我们检索CINAHL、EMBASE、MEDLINE和Web of Science，检索2015年以来发表的有关糖尿病自我管理应用程序和数字干预评估的文章，并让患者参与评估。然后，我们围绕纳入研究的质量、评估方法和评估标准，对研究结果进行了叙述性定性综合。结果:1681篇文献中，31篇符合纳入标准。 A total of 7 articles were considered of high confidence in the evidence. Apps were the most commonly used platform for diabetes self-management (18/31, 58%), and type 2 diabetes (T2D) was the targeted health condition most studies focused on (12/31, 38%). Questionnaires, interviews, and user-group meetings were the most common methods of evaluation. Furthermore, the most evaluated criteria for apps and digital diabetes self-management interventions were cognitive impact, clinical impact, and usability. Feasibility and security and privacy were not evaluated by studies considered of high confidence in the evidence. Conclusions: There were few studies with high confidence in the evidence that involved patients in the evaluation of apps and digital interventions for diabetes self-management. Additional evaluation criteria, such as sustainability and interoperability, should be focused on more in future studies to provide a better understanding of the effects and potential of apps and digital interventions for diabetes self-management. %M 32628125 %R 10.2196/18480 %U //www.mybigtv.com/2020/7/e18480 %U https://doi.org/10.2196/18480 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32628125