移动医疗领域的技术接受度:卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析定义，模型和测量的范围审查%A Nadal,Camille %A Sas,Corina %A Doherty,Gavin %+计算机科学与统计学院，都柏林三一学院，格林学院，都柏林，D2，爱尔兰，353 18963858,nadalc@tcd.ie %K技术接受生命周期%K患者接受度%K移动应用程序%K移动健康%K手机%D 2020 %7 6.7.2020 %9审查%J J Med Internet Res %G English %X背景:设计用户会感兴趣、开始使用并一直使用的技术一直是一个挑战。在健康领域，接受技术的问题更为重要，因为技术的可能侵入性可能导致患者甚至拒绝尝试它们。开发人员和研究人员不仅要在设计和评估新的医疗保健技术时解决这个问题，而且要在用户旅程的不同阶段解决这个问题。虽然这些阶段的定义范围存在，许多研究人员混淆了相关术语，该领域将受益于一套连贯的定义和相关的测量方法。目的:本综述旨在探讨在移动医疗(mHealth)文献中如何解释和测量技术接受度。我们试图将移动医疗研究中的接受治疗与现有的定义和模型进行比较，找出潜在的差距，并有助于澄清技术接受的过程。方法:我们在PubMed数据库中搜索以医学主题标题“患者接受医疗保健”和“移动应用程序”为索引的出版物。我们收录了以下出版物:(1)包含至少一个术语“可接受性”、“接受”、“采用”、“接受”或“采用”; and (2) defined the term. The final corpus included 68 relevant studies. Results: Several interpretations are associated with technology acceptance, few consistent with existing definitions. Although the literature has influenced the interpretation of the concept, usage is not homogeneous, and models are not adapted to populations with particular needs. The prevalence of measurement by custom surveys suggests a lack of standardized measurement tools. Conclusions: Definitions from the literature were published separately, which may contribute to inconsistent usage. A definition framework would bring coherence to the reporting of results, facilitating the replication and comparison of studies. We propose the Technology Acceptance Lifecycle, consolidating existing definitions, articulating the different stages of technology acceptance, and providing an explicit terminology. Our findings illustrate the need for a common definition and measurement framework and the importance of viewing technology acceptance as a staged process, with adapted measurement methods for each stage. %M 32628122 %R 10.2196/17256 %U //www.mybigtv.com/2020/7/e17256 %U https://doi.org/10.2196/17256 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32628122