%0期刊文章%@ 1438- 8871% I JMIR出版物%V 21卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析% N 6% P 1247% T社区护理在行政卫生分类系统中的可见性:内容覆盖评估%A Block,Lorraine J %A Currie,Leanne M %A Hardiker,Nicholas R %A Strudwick,Gillian +不列颠哥伦比亚大学护理学院，T201-2211 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 2B5, Canada, 1 604 822 7417，lori.block@ubc.ca %K世界卫生组织%K分类%K护理信息学%K医疗信息学%K数据收集%K术语%K社区卫生服务%K标准化护理术语%D 2019 %7 26.06.2019 %9原始论文%J J医学互联网Res %G英文%X背景:世界卫生组织正在制定一种国际卫生行政分类，称为国际卫生干预分类(ICHI)。国际干预计划的目的是提供一个工具，在全球范围内支持政策制定和其他方面的干预报告和分析。在任何卫生系统中，护士都是进行临床干预的最大资源。随着许多国家的护理工作从医院转向社区环境，确保社区护理干预措施出现在任何国际卫生信息系统中都很重要。因此，需要调查社区护理干预措施在何种程度上被ICHI覆盖。目的:本研究的目的是检查国际护理实践分类(ICNP)社区护理干预在国际护理实践管理分类系统中所代表的程度，以确定与覆盖差距相关的主题，并支持在理解标准化临床术语和分类中知识表示复杂性方面的持续进步。方法:本描述性研究在2018年分两个阶段采用内容映射方法。从ICNP社区护理目录中提取了187个护理干预代码，并映射到ICHI中。 In phase 1, 2 coders completed independent mapping activities. In phase 2, the 2 coders compared each list and discussed concept matches until consensus on ICNP-ICHI match and on mapping relationship was reached. Results: The initial percentage agreement between the 2 coders was 47% (n=88), but reached 100% with consensus processes. After consensus was reached, 151 (81%) of the community nursing interventions resulted in an ICHI match. A total of 36 (19%) of community nursing interventions had no match to ICHI content. A total of 100 (53%) community nursing interventions resulted in a broader ICHI code, 9 (5%) resulted in a narrower ICHI code, and 42 (23%) were considered equivalent. ICNP concepts that were not represented in ICHI were thematically grouped into the categories family and caregivers, death and dying, and case management. Conclusions: Overall, the content mapping yielded similar results to other content mapping studies in nursing. However, it also found areas of missing concept coverage, difficulties with interterminology mapping, and further need to develop mapping methods. %M 31244480 %R 10.2196/12847 %U //www.mybigtv.com/2019/6/e12847/ %U https://doi.org/10.2196/12847 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31244480