%0期刊文章%@ 1438- 8871% I JMIR出版物%V 19卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析% N 3% P e68% T评估当前主流可穿戴设备在健康监测中的一致性:自由生活条件下的比较%文A，张A，邢婷%刘a，雷兴宇%A，建波%+北京大学医学信息中心，北京海淀区学园路38号，100191，中国，86 (10)8280 5901,jblei@hsc.pku.edu.cn %K健身追踪器%K监测，生理%K运动活动%K日常生活活动%K健康状况%D 2017 %7 07.03.2017 %9原始论文%J J医学互联网Res %G英文%X背景:可穿戴设备正获得越来越多的市场关注;然而，这些设备的监测准确性和一致性仍然未知。目的:本研究旨在评估最新可穿戴设备在正常活动状态下的监测测量的一致性，为行业提供建议，为消费者做出购买选择提供支持。方法:选取10件具有代表性的可穿戴设备(2块中国品牌或国外品牌的智能手表、4个智能手环、4个手机app)，让5名受试者同时使用所有设备和app。从这些设备上连续5天获取完整的健康监测数据，分析不同设备监测测量值的差异程度和关系。结果:不同设备的日测量值波动较大，其变异系数(CV)波动范围为步数2-38%、距离5-30%、活动时长19-112%、总能量消耗(EE) 0.1 -17%、活动EE 22-100%、睡眠时长2-44%、深度睡眠时长35-117%。在整合设备间25天的测量数据后，步数(类内相关系数，ICC=.89)和距离(ICC=.84)的测量结果显示出良好的一致性，其次是活动持续时间(ICC=.59)和总EE (ICC=.59)和活动EE (ICC=.57)的测量结果。然而，睡眠持续时间(ICC=.30)和深度睡眠持续时间(ICC=.27)的测量结果很差。 For most devices, there was a strong correlation between the number of steps and distance measurements (R2>.95), and for some devices, there was a strong correlation between activity duration measurements and EE measurements (R2>.7). A strong correlation was observed in the measurements of steps, distance and EE from smart watches and mobile phones of the same brand, Apple or Samsung (r>.88). Conclusions: Although wearable devices are developing rapidly, the current mainstream devices are only reliable in measuring the number of steps and distance, which can be used as health assessment indicators. However, the measurement consistencies of activity duration, EE, sleep quality, and so on, are still inadequate, which require further investigation and improved algorithms. %M 28270382 %R 10.2196/jmir.6874 %U //www.mybigtv.com/2017/3/e68/ %U https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6874 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28270382