%0期刊文章%@ 1438-8871 %I JMIR出版物%V 19%卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析 N 3% P e67% T基于美国运动医学学院指南评估移动运动应用程序的质量:可靠有效的计分仪器%A Guo,Yi %A Bian,Jiang %A Leavitt,Trevor %A Vincent,Heather K %A Vander Zalm,Lindsey %A Teurlings,Tyler L %A Smith,Megan D %A Modave,François +佛罗里达大学健康结果和政策系，2004年莫里路，2251 PO信箱100165，佛罗里达州盖恩斯维尔，32610，美国，1 352 294 5969，yiguo@ufl.edu %K mHealth %K移动应用%K体育活动%K测量%D 2017 %7 07.03.2017 %9原始论文%J J医学互联网Res %G英语%X背景:定期体育活动不仅有助于体重管理，还可以降低心血管风险、癌症发病率和慢性疾病负担。然而，目前只有大约20%的美国人达到了美国卫生与公众服务部推荐的体育活动指南。随着移动技术的快速发展，移动应用程序有可能提高锻炼项目的参与率，特别是如果它们是基于证据的，且内容质量足够高。目的:本研究的目标是开发和测试一种仪器，该仪器旨在根据美国运动医学学院(ACSM)制定的运动指南，对运动计划应用程序的内容质量进行评分。方法:我们进行了两个焦点小组(N=14)，以获取输入，以开发基于ACSM运动处方指南的初步27项评分工具。三名非运动医学专家的评审员使用该仪器对28个运动项目应用程序进行了独立评分。在3名审稿人中评估了评分者之间和内部的可靠性。ACSM的一位专家评审员也对28个应用程序进行了评分，以创建标准评分。 Criterion validity was assessed by comparing nonexpert reviewers’ scores to the criterion scores. Results: Overall, inter- and intra-rater reliability was high with most coefficients being greater than .7. Inter-rater reliability coefficients ranged from .59 to .99, and intra-rater reliability coefficients ranged from .47 to 1.00. All reliability coefficients were statistically significant. Criterion validity was found to be excellent, with the weighted kappa statistics ranging from .67 to .99, indicating a substantial agreement between the scores of expert and nonexpert reviewers. Finally, all apps scored poorly against the ACSM exercise prescription guidelines. None of the apps received a score greater than 35, out of a possible maximal score of 70. Conclusions: We have developed and presented valid and reliable scoring instruments for exercise program apps. Our instrument may be useful for consumers and health care providers who are looking for apps that provide safe, progressive general exercise programs for health and fitness. %M 28270378 %R 10.2196/jmir.6976 %U //www.mybigtv.com/2017/3/e67/ %U https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6976 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28270378