杂志文章@ 1438- 8871% I JMIR出版公司自我管理和监督卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析版本的基于web的认知测试电池的比较:结果来自NutriNet-Santé队列研究%A Assmann,Karen E %A Bailet,Marion %A Lecoffre,Amandine C %A Galan,Pilar %A Hercberg,Serge %A Amieva,Hélène %A Kesse-Guyot,Emmanuelle %+ Université巴黎13，研究设备Epidémiologie营养(EREN)，中心'Epidémiologie et统计巴黎索邦大学Cité， Inserm (U1153)， Inra (U1125)， Cnam, COMUE Sorbonne Paris Cité， UFR SMBH, 74 rue Marcel Cachin，博比尼，93017，法国，33 1 48 38 73 78，k.assmann@eren.smbh.univ-paris13.fr %K认知%K执行功能%K互联网%K队列研究%D 2016 %7 05.04.2016 %9原始论文%J J医学互联网Res %G英文%X背景:痴呆症是一个重大的公共卫生问题，来自大型流行病学研究的重复认知数据可以帮助制定有效的早期预防措施。通过自我管理的在线工具收集数据可以大大减轻这种大规模调查的后勤和财政负担。在这种情况下，重要的是获得关于这种新的在线工具与传统的、有监督的认知评估模式的可比性的数据。目的:我们的目的是比较基于web的NutriNet-Santé认知测试组(NutriCog)的自我管理与神经心理学家的管理。方法:测试包括四项测试，测量精神运动速度、注意力、执行功能、情景记忆、工作记忆和联想记忆等方面。两种版本的认知电池测试由189名志愿者完成(首先是自我管理版本，n=99，或先是监督版本，n=90)。受试者还完成了一份满意度问卷。用Spearman相关法评估一致性。 Results: Agreement between both versions varied according to the investigated cognitive task and outcome variable. Spearman correlations ranged between .42 and .73. Moreover, a majority of participants responded that they “absolutely” or “rather” agreed that the duration of the self-administered battery was acceptable (184/185, 99.5%), that the tasks were amusing (162/185, 87.6%), that the instructions were sufficiently detailed (168/185; 90.8%) and understandable (164/185, 88.7%), and that they had overall enjoyed the test battery (182/185, 98.4%). Conclusions: The self-administered version of the Web-based NutriCog cognitive test battery provided similar information as the supervised version. Thus, integrating repeated cognitive evaluations into large cohorts via the implementation of self-administered online versions of traditional test batteries appears to be feasible. %M 27049114 %R 10.2196/jmir.4862 %U //www.mybigtv.com/2016/4/e68/ %U https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4862 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27049114

map