杂志文章@ 1438- 8871% I JMIR出版公司在澳大利亚建立卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析和管理电子精神卫生保健:挑战的系统回顾和政策导向研究的呼吁%A Meurk,Carla %A Leung,Janni %A Hall,Wayne %A Head,Brian W %A Whiteford,Harvey %+昆士兰大学医学和生物医学学院公共卫生学院，公共卫生大楼2层，赫斯顿，4006，澳大利亚，61 733655345，c.meurk@uq.edu.au %K远程医疗%K电子健康%K电子心理健康%K电子治疗%K互联网%K在线%K认知行为治疗%K焦虑%K焦虑障碍%K抑郁症%K抑郁症%K澳大利亚%K研究翻译%K证据知情政策%K实施%D 2016 %7 13.01.2016 %9原始论文%J J医学互联网Res %G英语%X背景:越来越多的证据证明电子心理健康服务的有效性。关于如何促进安全、有效和可持续地实施这些服务的证据较少。目的:我们对抑郁症和焦虑症电子心理健康服务的使用进行了系统综述，以为政策制定提供信息，并确定证据库中与政策相关的差距。方法:遵循PRISMA协议，我们确定了(1)在澳大利亚进行的研究，(2)关于电子精神健康服务，(3)针对抑郁症或焦虑症，以及(4)关于电子精神健康使用，如使用障碍和促进因素。检索的数据库包括Cochrane、PubMed、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Embase、ProQuest Social Science和谷歌Scholar。来源根据地区和政策相关性水平进行评估。结果:检索结果为1081项研究;纳入30项研究进行分析。 Most reported on self-selected samples and samples of online help-seekers. Studies indicate that e-mental health services are predominantly used by females, and those who are more educated and socioeconomically advantaged. Ethnicity was infrequently reported on. Studies examining consumer preferences found a preference for face-to-face therapy over e-therapies, but not an aversion to e-therapy. Content relevant to governance was predominantly related to the organizational dimensions of e-mental health services, followed by implications for community education. Financing and payment for e-services and governance of the information communication technology were least commonly discussed. Conclusions: Little research focuses explicitly on policy development and implementation planning; most research provides an e-services perspective. Research is needed to provide community and policy-maker perspectives. General population studies of prospective treatment seekers that include ethnicity and socioeconomic status and quantify relative preferences for all treatment modalities are necessary. %M 26764181 %R 10.2196/jmir.4827 %U //www.mybigtv.com/2016/1/e10/ %U https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4827 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26764181