杂志文章%@ 1438-8871 %I JMIR出版物公司%V 17 卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析%N 5 %P低健康素养和在线健康信息评估:文献的系统综述%A Diviani,Nicola %A van den Putte,Bas %A Giani,Stefano %A van Weert,Julia CM %+阿姆斯特丹传播研究学院/ ASCoR，传播科学系，阿姆斯特丹大学，邮政信箱15791，阿姆斯特丹，1001 NG，荷兰，31 6 15254105,N.Diviani@uva.nl %K健康信息搜索%K在线健康信息%K信息质量%K健康素养%D 2015 %7 07.05.2015 %9综述%J J医学互联网Res %G英语%X背景:近年来，消费者在网上寻求健康信息的数量急剧增加。然而，在线健康信息的质量仍然值得怀疑。信息评估问题已经成为一个热门话题，导致指南和检查清单的发展，以设计高质量的在线健康信息。然而，很少有人关注消费者，特别是健康素养较低的人群，如何评价在线健康信息。目的:本研究的主要目的是回顾关于低健康素养与(1)人们评价在线健康信息的能力、(2)在线健康信息的感知质量、(3)对在线健康信息的信任以及(4)在线健康信息评价标准的使用之间关系的现有证据。方法:系统检索MEDLINE、PsycINFO、Web of Science、CINAHL、Communication and Mass-media Complete 5个学术数据库。我们纳入了同行评议的出版物，调查具有不同健康素养水平的人对在线信息的评价差异。结果:经过摘要全文筛选，共收录38篇文献。 Only four studies investigated the specific role of low health literacy in the evaluation of online health information. The other studies examined the association between educational level or other skills-based proxies for health literacy, such as general literacy, and outcomes. Results indicate that low health literacy (and related skills) are negatively related to the ability to evaluate online health information and trust in online health information. Evidence on the association with perceived quality of online health information and use of evaluation criteria is inconclusive. Conclusions: The findings indicate that low health literacy (and related skills) play a role in the evaluation of online health information. This topic is therefore worth more scholarly attention. Based on the results of this review, future research in this field should (1) specifically focus on health literacy, (2) devote more attention to the identification of the different criteria people use to evaluate online health information, (3) develop shared definitions and measures for the most commonly used outcomes in the field of evaluation of online health information, and (4) assess the relationship between the different evaluative dimensions and the role played by health literacy in shaping their interplay. %M 25953147 %R 10.2196/jmir.4018 %U //www.mybigtv.com/2015/5/e112/ %U https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4018 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25953147