杂志文章@ 14388871% I JMIR出版物公司V 16% N卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析 4% P e115% T针对艾滋病毒疾病的健康相关生活质量的电子与纸质评估:PROQOL-HIV问卷的可靠性研究% Duracinsky,马丁%拉兰,克利斯朵夫% Goujard,塞西尔%赫曼,苏珊% Cheung-Lung,基督教%但是,让·保罗·施瓦茨%,亚尼克% Chassany,奥利弗巴黎狄德罗大学% +,索邦神学院Paris-Cite,团结de Methodologie des准则d”(Patient-Reported结果),EA矫揉造作的倩碧Coordonnee Ville-Hopital、方法论等法国393年(ED),卡雷historique德洛必达圣路易土耳其宫廷23日1大道Claude Vellefaux，巴黎cedex 10, 75475，法国，33 1 40 27 57 48,duracinsky.m@gmail.com %K HIV %K生活质量%K患者报告结果%K电子记录%K可靠性%D 2014年%7 2014年25.04月%9原始论文%J J医学互联网Res %G英文%X背景:电子患者报告结果(PRO)提供快速和通常可靠的患者健康相关生活质量(HRQL)评估。目的:编制患者报告的生活质量-人类免疫缺陷病毒(PROQOL-HIV)问卷电子版，并采用标准心理测量方法评估其表面效度和信度。方法:80例法国门诊患者样本(66%男性，52/79;平均年龄46.7岁，SD 10.9)。采用随机交叉设计(2-7天间隔)完成纸质问卷和电子问卷。收集生物医学数据。问卷版本和顺序效应在2向方差分析中对全量表评分进行检验，患者为随机效应。使用每个维度的Pearson和类内相关系数(ICC, 95%置信区间)评估测试-重测信度。 Usability testing was carried out from patients’ survey reports, specifically, general satisfaction, ease of completion, quality and clarity of user interface, and motivation to participate in follow-up PROQOL-HIV electronic assessments. Results: Questionnaire version and administration order effects (N=59 complete cases) were not significant at the 5% level, and no interaction was found between these 2 factors (P=.94). Reliability indexes were acceptable, with Pearson correlations greater than .7 and ICCs ranging from .708 to .939; scores were not statistically different between the two versions. A total of 63 (79%) complete patients’ survey reports were available, and 55% of patients (30/55) reported being satisfied and interested in electronic assessment of their HRQL in clinical follow-up. Individual ratings of PROQOL-HIV user interface (85%-100% of positive responses) confirmed user interface clarity and usability. Conclusions: The electronic PROQOL-HIV introduces minor modifications to the original paper-based version, following International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) ePRO Task Force guidelines, and shows good reliability and face validity. Patients can complete the computerized PROQOL-HIV questionnaire and the scores from the paper or electronic versions share comparable accuracy and interpretation. %M 24769643 %R 10.2196/jmir.3330 %U //www.mybigtv.com/2014/4/e115/ %U https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3330 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24769643