%0期刊文章@ 1438-8871 %I Gunther Eysenbach %V 15% N 2% P e24 %T关于医生评级网站的八个问题:A系统综述%A Emmert,Martin %A Sander,Uwe %A Pisch,Frank %+管理学院(IFM)，商学院，弗里德里希-亚历山大-大学erlangen -纽伦堡，Lange Gasse 20，纽伦堡，90411，德国，49 911 5302 253 ext 253, Martin.Emmert@wiso.uni-erlangen.de %K医生评级网站%K患者叙述%K公开报告%K透明度%K系统综述%D 2013 %7 01.02.2013 %9原始论文%J J医学互联网Res %G英文%X背景:医生评级网站目前越来越受欢迎，因为它们增加了医疗保健系统的透明度。然而，对这些门户网站的特征和内容的研究仍然有限。目的:识别和综合同行评审期刊上发表的关于医生评级网站经常讨论的问题的证据。方法:在7个数据库(Medline(通过PubMed)、Cochrane Library、Business Source Complete、ABI/Inform Complete、PsycInfo、Scopus和ISI web of knowledge)中搜索同行评议的英语和德语文献，没有任何时间限制。此外，对纳入研究的参考文献列表进行了筛选以确保完整性。以下八个先前定义的问题被解决:1)有多少百分比的医生被评级?2)医生评分网站上的平均评分数是多少?3)被评为医生的社会经济地位是否存在差异? 4) Are ratings more likely to be positive or negative? 5) What significance do patient narratives have? 6) How should physicians deal with physician-rating websites? 7) What major shortcomings do physician-rating websites have? 8) What recommendations can be made for further improvement of physician-rating websites? Results: Twenty-four articles published in peer-reviewed journals met our inclusion criteria. Most studies were published by US (n=13) and German (n=8) researchers; however, the focus differed considerably. The current usage of physician-rating websites is still low but is increasing. International data show that 1 out of 6 physicians has been rated, and approximately 90% of all ratings on physician-rating websites were positive. Although often a concern, we could not find any evidence of "doctor-bashing". Physicians should not ignore these websites, but rather, monitor the information available and use it for internal and ex-ternal purpose. Several shortcomings limit the significance of the results published on physician-rating websites; some recommendations to address these limitations are presented. Conclusions: Although the number of publications is still low, physician-rating websites are gaining more attention in research. But the current condition of physician-rating websites is lacking. This is the case both in the United States and in Germany. Further research is necessary to increase the quality of the websites, especially from the patients’ perspective. %M 23372115 %R 10.2196/jmir.2360 %U //www.mybigtv.com/2013/2/e24/ %U https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2360 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23372115