杂志文章JMIR出版公司用于更智能地提供精神健康项目的智能手机:卡塔尔世界杯8强波胆分析系统回顾%亚粘土,塔拉%皮特里,凯瑟琳% Proudfoot,朱迪克拉克%,珍妮%桦树,玛丽玫瑰号%克里斯滕森,海伦% +黑狗研究所,新南威尔士大学医院的路,威尔士亲王医院,2031年,澳大利亚,悉尼61 5988 265,t.donker@vu.nl % K移动应用程序% K移动心理健康% K手机% K自助% K抑郁% K焦虑% K应力% K物质使用% D 2013% 7 15.11.2013 % 9审查% J J互联网Res % G英语% X背景:移动电话应用程序使用的迅速增长为增加获得循证精神卫生保健提供了机会。目的:我们的目标是系统地审查支持移动设备(如智能手机和平板电脑)的心理健康应用程序对所有年龄层的有效性的研究证据。方法:对MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane中央对照试验登记册(Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials)、psyinfo、psytests、Compendex和Inspec进行2008-2013年的综合文献检索。我们包括了通过测试前后设计或与对照组进行比较的移动设备上的心理健康应用程序(针对抑郁、焦虑、药物使用、睡眠障碍、自杀行为、自我伤害、精神病障碍、饮食障碍、压力和赌博)的影响的试验。对照组可以由等待名单、常规治疗或其他公认的治疗组成。结果:共鉴定出5464个摘要。其中，8篇论文描述了5个针对抑郁、焦虑和药物滥用的应用程序，符合纳入标准。四个应用程序提供了心理健康专业人士的支持。 Results showed significant reductions in depression, stress, and substance use. Within-group and between-group intention-to-treat effect sizes ranged from 0.29-2.28 and 0.01-0.48 at posttest and follow-up, respectively. Conclusions: Mental health apps have the potential to be effective and may significantly improve treatment accessibility. However, the majority of apps that are currently available lack scientific evidence about their efficacy. The public needs to be educated on how to identify the few evidence-based mental health apps available in the public domain to date. Further rigorous research is required to develop and test evidence-based programs. Given the small number of studies and participants included in this review, the high risk of bias, and unknown efficacy of long-term follow-up, current findings should be interpreted with caution, pending replication. Two of the 5 evidence-based mental health apps are currently commercially available in app stores. %M 24240579 %R 10.2196/jmir.2791 %U //www.mybigtv.com/2013/11/e247/ %U https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2791 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24240579