%0期刊文章@ 1438- 8871% I Gunther Eysenbach %V 14% N 4% P e107% T两种基于互联网的问题饮酒者干预的比较:随机对照试验%A Cunningham,John Alastair %+社会和流行病学研究，成瘾和精神健康中心，33 Russell St，多伦多，ON, M5S 2S1，加拿大，1 416 535 8501 ext 4682, john_cunningham@camh.net %K随机对照试验%K问题饮酒%K酒精滥用%K基于互联网的干预%K eHealth %K简短干预%D 2012 %7 01.08.2012 %9原始论文%J J医学互联网Res %G英文%X背景:酒精问题是一个严重的公共健康问题，很少有问题饮酒者寻求治疗。互联网是促进获得医疗服务的一种手段，但还需要进行更多的研究，以测试可采用的最佳干预类型。评估基于互联网的干预措施，包括各种研究验证的认知行为工具，这些工具已被证明对那些有更严重的酒精问题的人有帮助，应该是一个优先事项。目的:评估与简短的互联网干预相比，为酒精问题提供长期的互联网干预是否在促进减少酒精消费方面提供额外的好处。目前试验的假设是，与获得短暂互联网干预(检查你的饮酒[CYD]筛查)的受访者相比，获得长期互联网干预(酒精帮助中心[AHC])的受访者在6个月的随访中显示出显著改善的饮酒结果。方法:采用单盲随机对照试验，随访6个月。研究人员在一个大城市通过报纸广告招募了一个问题饮酒者的普通人群样本。基线和随访数据通过邮件收集。 Results: A volunteer sample of problem drinkers of legal drinking age with home access to the Internet were recruited for the trial. Of 239 potential respondents recruited in 2010, 170 met inclusion criteria (average age 45 years; 101/170, 59.4% male; average Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test [AUDIT] score of 22). Follow-up rates were 90.0% (153/170) with no adverse effects of the interventions reported. A repeated-measures multivariate analysis of variance of the outcome measures using an intent-to-treat approach found a significantly greater reduction in amount of drinking among participants provided access to the AHC than among participants provided access to the CYD (P = .046). Conclusions: The provision of the AHC gave additional benefit in the short term to problem drinkers over that seen from the research-validated CYD, indicating the benefits of promoting access to these interventions as one means of helping people with problem drinking concerns. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01114919; http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01114919 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/68t1dCkRZ) %M 22954459 %R 10.2196/jmir.2090 %U //www.mybigtv.com/2012/4/e107/ %U https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2090 %U http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22954459

map