@Article{信息:doi 10.2196 / / jmir.5.3。e21，作者=" dueta - bergman, Mohan"，标题="可信的在线健康信息来源:人口统计学、健康信念和健康信息取向的差异"，期刊="J医学互联网研究"，年="2003"，月="Sep"，日="25"，卷="5"，数="3"，页数="e21"，关键词="互联网;信息来源的可信度;人口结构;信仰;健康信念;健康意识;背景:最近在线健康信息的激增和消费者对这些信息的使用导致了专家对万维网上健康信息可信度的猜测和处方。尽管人们越来越关注在线健康信息源，但现有研究表明，消费者在评估互联网上不同健康信息源的可信度方面存在缺陷。目的:本研究调查了消费者对万维网上健康信息来源的评价，比较了最信任特定信息来源的个人和最不信任特定健康信息来源的个人之间的人口统计学、态度和认知差异。 Comparisons are made across a variety of sources. Methods: The Porter Novelli HealthStyles database, collected annually since 1995, is based on the results of nationally-representative postal-mail surveys. In 1999, 2636 respondents provided usable data for the HealthStyles database. Independent sample t tests were conducted to compare the respondents in the realm of demographic, attitudinal, and cognitive variables. Results: The most trusted sources of online health information included the personal doctor, medical university, and federal government. The results demonstrated significant differences in demographic and health-oriented variables when respondents who trusted a particular online source were compared with respondents that did not trust the source, suggesting the need for a segmented approach to research and application. Individuals trusting the local doctor were younger ( t2634= 4.02, P< .001) and held stronger health beliefs (F 1= 5.65, P= .018); individuals trusting the local hospital were less educated ( t2634= 3.83, P< .001), low health information oriented (F 1= 6.41, P= .011), and held weaker health beliefs (F 1= 5.56, P= .018). Respondents with greater trust in health insurance companies as online health information sources were less educated ( t2634= 1.90, P= .05) and less health information oriented (F 1= 4.30, P= .04). Trust in medical universities was positively associated with education ( t2634= 11.83, P< .001), income ( t2634= 10.19, P< .001), and health information orientation (F 1= 10.32, P<.001). Similar results were observed in the realm of federal information credibility, with individuals with greater trust in federal sources being more educated ( t2634= 7.45, P< .001) and health information oriented (F 1= 4.45, P= .04) than their counterparts. Conclusions: The results suggest systematic differences in the consumer segment based on the different sources of health information trusted by the consumer. While certain sources such as the local hospital and the health insurance company might serve as credible sources of health information for the lower socioeconomic and less health-oriented consumer segment, sources such as medical universities and federal Web sites might serve as trustworthy sources for the higher socioeconomic and more health-oriented groups. ", issn="1438-8871", doi="10.2196/jmir.5.3.e21", url="//www.mybigtv.com/2003/3/e21/", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.5.3.e21", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14517112" }