@Article{信息:doi 10.2196 / / jmir.2.3。e16，作者=“Oyston, John”，标题=“麻醉师对来自未知患者的电子邮件咨询意见的回应”，期刊=“J医学互联网Res”，年=“2000”，月=“Sep”，日=“18”，卷=“2”，数=“3”，页数=“e16”，关键词=“互联网;电子邮件;电子邮件;转介及谘询;病史;保健质量;医师执业模式;远程会诊;医患关系; Professional-Patient Relations", abstract="Background: People are using the Internet as a method of getting medical advice. Some Web sites include the email addresses of physicians, and some people are contacting these physicians for advice. As many patients undergo surgery on a ``day surgery'' basis, they often have no opportunity to ask anesthesiologists for advice before surgery; these patients may be more likely than other groups to use Internet email to ask questions. It seemed that it would be useful to find out what, if any, advice anesthesiologists would give in response to email from an unknown patient. Objective: To determine how anesthesiologists would respond to an email requesting advice about an anesthetic problem from an unknown patient. Methods: In February 1998, an email message was sent from a fictitious patient, using an email address created for this study, to 115 anesthesiologists whose email addresses were found on publicly accessible web sites. The message described the patient's problem with a previously administered anesthetic and requested advice about anesthesia for upcoming surgery. Responses were entered in a database and analyzed to determine the percentage of anesthesiologists who responded, and how helpful, accurate, and complete their advice was. Results: Fifty-eight responses were obtained from 108 valid email addresses (54{\%} response rate). Of these, 78{\%} were received within 48 hours. Eighty-three percent (83{\%}) of respondents suggested contacting a local physician, 62{\%} mentioned reviewing the old chart, and 41{\%} suggested a specific diagnosis. None of the initial replies contained inaccurate advice, but only five responses were considered to be comprehensive. Ten percent (10{\%}) included a disclaimer with the response. Eighty-three percent (83{\%}) of replies were subjectively assessed as being friendly in tone. Conclusions: At present, patients who email an unknown anesthesiologist can expect to get a reply from over half. The advice is likely to be prompt, friendly, and to provide accurate and appropriate - but probably incomplete - advice. ", issn="1438-8871", doi="10.2196/jmir.2.3.e16", url="//www.mybigtv.com/2000/3/e16/", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2.3.e16", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11720939" }