@文章{信息:doi/10.2196/36322，作者="Arellano Carmona, Kimberly和Chittamuru, Deepti和Kravitz, Richard L和Ramondt, Steven和Ram{\'i}rez, A Susana"，标题="从智能网络症状检查器中寻找健康信息:横断面问卷研究"，期刊="J医学互联网研究"，年="2022"，月="8"，日="19"，卷="24"，数="8"，页="e36322"，关键词="健康信息搜索;健康信息;信息寻求;信息导引头;信息行为;人工智能;医疗信息系统;数字鸿沟;信息不平等;数字流行病学; symptom checker; digital health; eHealth; online health information; user demographic; health information resource; health information tool; digital health assistant", abstract="Background: The ever-growing amount of health information available on the web is increasing the demand for tools providing personalized and actionable health information. Such tools include symptom checkers that provide users with a potential diagnosis after responding to a set of probes about their symptoms. Although the potential for their utility is great, little is known about such tools' actual use and effects. Objective: We aimed to understand who uses a web-based artificial intelligence--powered symptom checker and its purposes, how they evaluate the experience of the web-based interview and quality of the information, what they intend to do with the recommendation, and predictors of future use. Methods: Cross-sectional survey of web-based health information seekers following the completion of a symptom checker visit (N=2437). Measures of comprehensibility, confidence, usefulness, health-related anxiety, empowerment, and intention to use in the future were assessed. ANOVAs and the Wilcoxon rank sum test examined mean outcome differences in racial, ethnic, and sex groups. The relationship between perceptions of the symptom checker and intention to follow recommended actions was assessed using multilevel logistic regression. Results: Buoy users were well-educated (1384/1704, 81.22{\%} college or higher), primarily White (1227/1693, 72.47{\%}), and female (2069/2437, 84.89{\%}). Most had insurance (1449/1630, 88.89{\%}), a regular health care provider (1307/1709, 76.48{\%}), and reported good health (1000/1703, 58.72{\%}). Three types of symptoms---pain (855/2437, 35.08{\%}), gynecological issues (293/2437, 12.02{\%}), and masses or lumps (204/2437, 8.37{\%})---accounted for almost half (1352/2437, 55.48{\%}) of site visits. Buoy's top three primary recommendations split across less-serious triage categories: primary care physician in 2 weeks (754/2141, 35.22{\%}), self-treatment (452/2141, 21.11{\%}), and primary care in 1 to 2 days (373/2141, 17.42{\%}). Common diagnoses were musculoskeletal (303/2437, 12.43{\%}), gynecological (304/2437, 12.47{\%}) and skin conditions (297/2437, 12.19{\%}), and infectious diseases (300/2437, 12.31{\%}). Users generally reported high confidence in Buoy, found it useful and easy to understand, and said that Buoy made them feel less anxious and more empowered to seek medical help. Users for whom Buoy recommended ``Waiting/Watching'' or ``Self-Treatment'' had strongest intentions to comply, whereas those advised to seek primary care had weaker intentions. Compared with White users, Latino and Black users had significantly more confidence in Buoy (P<.05), and the former also found it significantly more useful (P<.05). Latino (odds ratio 1.96, 95{\%} CI 1.22-3.25) and Black (odds ratio 2.37, 95{\%} CI 1.57-3.66) users also had stronger intentions to discuss recommendations with a provider than White users. Conclusions: Results demonstrate the potential utility of a web-based health information tool to empower people to seek care and reduce health-related anxiety. However, despite encouraging results suggesting the tool may fulfill unmet health information needs among women and Black and Latino adults, analyses of the user base illustrate persistent second-level digital divide effects. ", issn="1438-8871", doi="10.2196/36322", url="//www.mybigtv.com/2022/8/e36322", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/36322", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35984690" }