@文章{info:doi/ 10.21960 /27648，作者="Coulson, Neil S and Buchanan, Heather"，标题="在线支持小组在帮助受艾滋病毒和艾滋病影响的个人中的作用:文献范围综述"，期刊="J Med Internet Res"，年="2022"，月="7"，日="26"，卷="24"，数="7"，页="e27648"，关键词="艾滋病;艾滋病毒;在线支持小组;互联网;同伴支持;社会支持;合成;背景:在线支持小组为艾滋病毒/艾滋病感染者提供了向同伴寻求信息、建议和支持的机会。然而，在线支持团体的参与是否以及如何帮助艾滋病毒和艾滋病感染者仍不清楚，这一主题的证据的性质也不清楚。目的:本范围审查旨在探讨参与与艾滋病相关的在线支持小组是否在心理社会健康和疾病管理方面对成员有益，成员是否经历过这些小组的任何消极方面，以及在艾滋病相关的在线支持小组中交换了哪些类型的社会支持。 Methods: A scoping review of English-language articles (including both qualitative and quantitative studies) was undertaken using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The databases searched included MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL (Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials), and Scopus. Key findings were synthesized using a narrative and thematic approach. Results: A total of 22 papers met the inclusion criteria from an initial pool of 3332 abstracts. These papers included 23{\%} (5/22) quantitative studies, 9{\%} (2/22) mixed methods studies, and 68{\%} (15/22) qualitative studies published between 2007 and 2019. Cross-sectional evidence suggests that engagement with HIV and AIDS--related online support groups is empowering for members and may lead to a range of psychosocial benefits. Furthermore, qualitative evidence suggests that these groups provide an opportunity to connect with similar people and share experiences. This can help improve self-worth, reduce stigma, facilitate improved illness management, and gain greater confidence when interacting with health professionals. However, online support groups are not without their limitations as qualitative evidence suggests that users may encounter examples of interpersonal conflict between members as well as be exposed to challenging content. Finally, HIV and AIDS--related online support groups are avenues through which individuals can solicit support, most commonly informational or emotional. Conclusions: HIV and AIDS--related online support groups may have some benefits for members, particularly in terms of providing social support. There is a need for a systematic review of this literature that includes an assessment of the methodological quality of the available evidence. ", issn="1438-8871", doi="10.2196/27648", url="//www.mybigtv.com/2022/7/e27648", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/27648", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35881456" }