@文章{信息:doi/10.2196/30065，作者=“Pearson, Rahel和Carl, Emily和Creech, Suzannah K”，标题=“退伍军人的计算机心理干预:随机控制试验的系统回顾”，期刊=“J医学互联网研究”，年=“2022”，月=“Jun”，日=“3”，卷=“24”，数=“6”，页=“e30065”，关键词=“计算机;数字;互联网;干预措施;退伍军人;服务成员;审查;背景:计算机心理干预可以克服在退伍军人事务和国防部环境中使用精神卫生保健的后勤和心理障碍。目的:在本系统综述中，我们旨在概述现有文献，目的是描述:现有文献的范围和质量、干预特征、研究方法、研究疗效、研究局限性和未来研究的潜在方向。方法:使用PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)指南对两个数据库(PsycINFO和PubMed)进行系统搜索，从开始到2020年11月15日。 The following inclusion criteria were used: the study was published in an English language peer-reviewed journal, participants were randomly allocated to a computerized psychological intervention or a control group (non--computerized psychological intervention active treatment or nonactive control group), an intervention in at least one treatment arm was primarily delivered through the computer or internet with or without additional support, participants were veterans or service members, and the study used validated measures to examine the effect of treatment on psychological outcomes. Results: This review included 23 studies that met the predefined inclusion criteria. Most studies were at a high risk of bias. Targeted outcomes, participant characteristics, type of support delivered, adherence, and participant satisfaction were described. Most of the examined interventions (19/24, 79{\%}) yielded positive results. Study limitations included participant characteristics limiting study inference, high rates of attrition, and an overreliance on self-reported outcomes. Conclusions: Relatively few high-quality studies were identified, and more rigorous investigations are needed. Several recommendations for future research are discussed, including the adoption of methods that minimize attrition, optimize use, and allow for personalization of treatment. ", issn="1438-8871", doi="10.2196/30065", url="//www.mybigtv.com/2022/6/e30065", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/30065", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35657663" }