@文章{信息:doi/10.2196/29092，作者=“James-Palmer, Aurora and Anderson, Ellen Zambo and Daneault，让-弗朗索瓦”，标题=“通过技术远程提供瑜伽干预:范围回顾”，期刊=“J医学互联网研究”，年=“2022”，月=“Jun”，日=“6”，卷=“24”，数=“6”，页=“e29092”，关键词=“补充疗法;身心;远程交付;telerehabilitation;电子健康;瑜伽;背景:瑜伽的流行和对其潜在健康益处的了解最近有所增加。不幸的是，并不是每个人都能轻松地参加面对面的瑜伽课程。在过去的十年里，远程瑜伽在现实世界中的应用越来越多。然而，相关的科学文献的状态尚不清楚。 Objective: This scoping review aimed to identify gaps in the literature related to the remote delivery of yoga interventions, including gaps related to the populations studied, the yoga intervention characteristics (delivery methods and intervention components implemented), the safety and feasibility of the interventions, and the preliminary efficacy of the interventions. Methods: This scoping review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines. Scientific databases were searched throughout April 2021 for experimental studies involving yoga delivered through technology. Eligibility was assessed through abstract and title screening and a subsequent full-article review. The included articles were appraised for quality, and data were extracted from each article. Results: A total of 12 studies of weak to moderate quality were included. Populations varied in physical and mental health status. Of the 12 studies, 10 (83{\%}) implemented asynchronous delivery methods (via prerecorded material), 1 (8{\%}) implemented synchronous delivery methods (through videoconferencing), and 1 (8{\%}) did not clearly describe the delivery method. Yoga interventions were heterogeneous in style and prescribed dose but primarily included yoga intervention components of postures, breathing, and relaxation and meditation. Owing to the heterogeneous nature of the included studies, conclusive findings regarding the preliminary efficacy of the interventions could not be ascertained. Conclusions: Several gaps in the literature were identified. Overall, this review showed that more attention needs to be paid to yoga intervention delivery methods while designing studies and developing interventions. Decisions regarding delivery methods should be justified and not made arbitrarily. Studies of high methodological rigor and robust reporting are needed. ", issn="1438-8871", doi="10.2196/29092", url="//www.mybigtv.com/2022/6/e29092", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/29092", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35666562" }