@文章{信息:doi/10.2196/31810,作者=“Schmieding, Malte L and Kopka, Marvin and Schmidt, Konrad and Schulz-Niethammer, Sven and Balzer, Felix and Feufel, Markus A”,标题=“症状检查程序分类准确性:5年随访评估”,期刊=“J Med Internet Res”,年=“2022”,月=“5”,日=“10”,卷=“24”,号=“5”,页=“e31810”,关键词=“数字健康”;分流;症状检查;以病人为中心的护理;电子健康应用;背景:症状检查器是一种数字工具,帮助外行人自我评估其医疗投诉的紧迫性和潜在原因。它们被广泛使用,但面临着来自患者和卫生保健专业人员的担忧,特别是在它们的准确性方面。2015年的一项具有里程碑意义的研究证实了这些担忧,该研究使用病例插图来证明症状检查人员在分类评估中通常会出错。目的:本研究旨在回顾里程碑指数研究,探讨自2015年以来症状检查者的能力是否以及如何演变,并将其与外行人的独立分诊评估进行比较。方法:在2020年初,我们搜索了提供分诊建议的智能手机和网络应用程序。 We evaluated these apps on the same 45 case vignettes as the index study. Using descriptive statistics, we compared our findings with those of the index study and with publicly available data on laypersons' triage capability. Results: We retrieved 22 symptom checkers providing triage advice. The median triage accuracy in 2020 (55.8{\%}, IQR 15.1{\%}) was close to that in 2015 (59.1{\%}, IQR 15.5{\%}). The apps in 2020 were less risk averse (odds 1.11:1, the ratio of overtriage errors to undertriage errors) than those in 2015 (odds 2.82:1), missing >40{\%} of emergencies. Few apps outperformed laypersons in either deciding whether emergency care was required or whether self-care was sufficient. No apps outperformed the laypersons on both decisions. Conclusions: Triage performance of symptom checkers has, on average, not improved over the course of 5 years. It decreased in 2 use cases (advice on when emergency care is required and when no health care is needed for the moment). However, triage capability varies widely within the sample of symptom checkers. Whether it is beneficial to seek advice from symptom checkers depends on the app chosen and on the specific question to be answered. Future research should develop resources (eg, case vignette repositories) to audit the capabilities of symptom checkers continuously and independently and provide guidance on when and to whom they should be recommended. ", issn="1438-8871", doi="10.2196/31810", url="//www.mybigtv.com/2022/5/e31810", url="https://doi.org/10.2196/31810", url="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536633" }
Baidu
map